Comparative Effects of Visual and Pressure Biofeedback in Symptomatic Forward Head Posture.
- Conditions
- Forward Head Posture
- Interventions
- Other: Cervical StabilizationDevice: Pressure BiofeedbackDevice: Visual Biofeedback
- Registration Number
- NCT06151951
- Lead Sponsor
- Riphah International University
- Brief Summary
This study aims to determined the comparative effect of visual and pressure biofeedback on Pain,Disability and Range of Motion in young and middle aged adults diagnosed with forward head posture.
- Detailed Description
Forward head posture describes the shifting of the head forward with the chin poking out. It is caused by increased flexion of the lower cervical spine and upper thoracic.
Forward head posture is the most frequently observed postural deviations and is said to be associated with shortening of posterior cervical extensors and weakening of the anterior deep cervical flexors. In this randomized control trial participants showing forward head posture will be randomly assigned into two intervention groups. 28 subjects were divided equally into two groups 14 each containing both genders. Group A (Experimental group) will be given isometric strengthening and stretching training guided pressure biofeedback.
Group B (Experimental group) will be given isometric strengthening and stretching training of deep cervical flexor (DCF) muscle guided through visual biofeedback .
Each participant will be receive a total of twelve treatment sessions over a four-week period. The efficacy of the interventions will be assessed at the beginning (first session) and conclusion (last session) of the treatment period. The assessment will encompass various outcome measures. Pain intensity will be evaluated using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), while disability levels will be measured using the Neck Disability Index (NDI). The cervical active range of motions (CAROMs) will be assessed by goniometry. Finally, the visual feedback referred as indicator of measuring forward head posture by evaluating these outcome measures insights will be gained into the impact of the interventions on the participants' symptoms and postural alignment through light. The randomized design of the trial provide valuable information to healthcare professionals on how to manage symptomatic forward head posture and may contribute to the development of future research in this area.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 28
- Participants would be complaining of neck pain as a primary complain and age of 20- 35 year was recruited in the study .
2 . Male and female both gender are included in the study.
-
patient with Craniovertebral angle (CVA)<53 degree were included in the study .
-
Score more than 3 on NPRS and more than 10 on NDI.
Participant failing to fall in this category would be excluded of the study.
- Neurogenic findings like cervical trauma, myopathy, vestibular pathology, dizziness, visual problem, spinal Fracture, dislocation and hypertension will not include in the study.
- History of sever metabolic diseases.
- History of recurrent surgery in upper thoracic and lumber vertebrae
- History of recent fractures in shoulder and neck region.
- History of tumor. -
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Group A Pressure Biofeedback Movement control training of Neck flexor muscles with Pressure Biofeedback along with baseline treatment Group A Cervical Stabilization Movement control training of Neck flexor muscles with Pressure Biofeedback along with baseline treatment Group B Cervical Stabilization Movement control training of Neck flexor muscles with Visual Biofeedback along with baseline treatment Group B Visual Biofeedback Movement control training of Neck flexor muscles with Visual Biofeedback along with baseline treatment
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) 4 weeks The NPRS is a subjective pain rating scale using an 11-point scale from 0 to 10, where 0 means 'no pain' and 10 means 'intolerable pain'. Participants select the whole number that best represents their level of pain. The reliability is \>0.95 with ICC values 0.86- 0.95
Neck Disability Index (NDI) 4 weeks NDI is a self-reported questionnaire which is formulated to assess pain that restricts the activities of daily living (ADL); it also helps to determine self-assessed disability. NDI has 10 domains covering pain intensity, personal care, lifting, reading, headaches, concentration, work, driving, sleeping, and recreation. Scores range from 0 to 50, with 50 being the greatest levels of dysfunction. It is a valid and reliable tool with ICC=0.98
Pressure Biofeedback (Simple Sphygmomanometer) 4 weeks It is used to measure the neck muscle strength. It was consisting of 3 chamber air filled pressure bag, a catheter \& sphygmomanometer gauze. To measure the strength, cuff is placed under occipital in supine position for Neck flexor and under forehead in prone position for neck extensor muscle. After setting pressure with the baseline Pressure of 100 mmHg, patient was asked to put maximum effort on cuff by giving 6 seconds hold for 3 repetitions. After taking the mean value, it is compared with the normal extensor flexor.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Visual Biofeedback (LED Headband light) 4 weeks This light is known as light panel that contain rectangular shape light focusing panel that maintain the focus through manual adjustment.
goniometry 4 weeks A goniometer is a device that measures an angle or permits the rotation of an object to a definite position. In orthopedics, the former description applies more. It is valid and reliable tool for measuring range of motion.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Bahawal Victoria Hospital QAMC Bahawalpur
🇵🇰Bahāwalpur, Punjab, Pakistan