Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02713191
NCT02713191
Completed
Phase 2

Efficacy and Safety of Dexmedetomidine vs. Midazolam Sedation in Patients Undergoing Convex-probe Endobronchial Ultrasound: a Randomized Double Blind Trial

Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh1 site in 1 country197 target enrollmentMarch 2016

Overview

Phase
Phase 2
Intervention
Dexmedetomidine
Conditions
Conscious Sedation During Procedure
Sponsor
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh
Enrollment
197
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Number of midazolam boluses administered to achieve targeted Ramsay sedation score of two
Status
Completed
Last Updated
9 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The randomized controlled trial will compare efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine to midazolam for sedation during endobronchial ultrasound

Detailed Description

Benzodiazepines, opioids, and propofol are currently used alone or in combination for achieving sedation during endobronchial ultrasound and other bronchoscopic procedures. However, all these agents carry a risk of respiratory depression. Dexmedetomidine, a highly selective adrenergic alpha-2 agonist, has sedative and analgesic properties but does not cause respiratory depression. This study aims to compare efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine as a sedative to midazolam in patients with hilar/mediastinal lymphadenopathy undergoing convex-probe endobronchial ultrasonography on day care basis. Patients will be randomized to receive either dexmedetomidine plus fentanyl or midazolam plus fentanyl prior to procedure, followed by dexmedetomidine or saline infusion respectively during the procedure. Ramsay sedation score of two will be targeted, failing which patients in both groups will receive midazolam bolus on as-needed basis. Bronchoscopist will remain blinded to group allocation. Patients will be monitored for sedation, oxygenation and hemodynamic parameters throughout. Need for additional midazolam, sedative efficacy, frequency of adverse respiratory and hemodynamic events, and bronchoscopist and patient satisfaction with the procedure will be compared between the two groups.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
March 2016
End Date
February 1, 2017
Last Updated
9 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Ashutosh Nath Aggarwal

Professor of Pulmonary Medicine

Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age 18 years or more
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II
  • Presence of hilar and/or mediastinal lymph nodes on thoracic CT scan

Exclusion Criteria

  • Known allergy to dexmedetomidine or midazolam or fentanyl
  • Documented coagulopathy
  • Pregnancy
  • Hemodynamic instability (hypotension, arrhythmia, recent acute coronary event)
  • Neuropsychiatric illness
  • History of previous endobronchial ultrasound procedure
  • Refusal to provide consent

Arms & Interventions

Dexmedetomidine

Dexmedetomidine + fentanyl before, and dexmedetomidine infusion during, procedure

Intervention: Dexmedetomidine

Dexmedetomidine

Dexmedetomidine + fentanyl before, and dexmedetomidine infusion during, procedure

Intervention: Rescue midazolam

Dexmedetomidine

Dexmedetomidine + fentanyl before, and dexmedetomidine infusion during, procedure

Intervention: Fentanyl

Midazolam

Midazolam + fentanyl before, and matching saline infusion during, procedure

Intervention: Midazolam bolus

Midazolam

Midazolam + fentanyl before, and matching saline infusion during, procedure

Intervention: Saline placebo

Midazolam

Midazolam + fentanyl before, and matching saline infusion during, procedure

Intervention: Rescue midazolam

Midazolam

Midazolam + fentanyl before, and matching saline infusion during, procedure

Intervention: Fentanyl

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Number of midazolam boluses administered to achieve targeted Ramsay sedation score of two

Time Frame: From start of endobronchial ultrasound procedure until finish of endobronchial ultrasound procedure, assessed up to two hours

Secondary Outcomes

  • Mean difference in depth of sedation during procedure as assessed by Ramsay scale(From start of endobronchial ultrasound procedure until finish of endobronchial ultrasound procedure, assessed up to two hours)
  • Mean difference in time taken to discharge patient from post-procedure recovery room(From end of endobronchial ultrasound procedure until final patient discharge from recovery room, assessed up to twelve hours)
  • Frequency of adverse hemodynamic events - hypotension, hypertension, tachycardia, bradycardia(From start of endobronchial ultrasound procedure until finish of endobronchial ultrasound procedure, assessed up to two hours)
  • Frequency of respiratory events - hypoxia, need for air airway maneuvers to maintain oxygenation(From start of endobronchial ultrasound procedure until finish of endobronchial ultrasound procedure, assessed up to two hours)
  • Mean difference in patient and physician satisfaction related to procedure as assessed by visual analogue scale(Immediately after endobronchial ultrasound procedure)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials