EVUS guided wiring vs. knuckle wiring for femoropopliteal chronic total occlusive lesio
- Conditions
- peripheral artery disease
- Registration Number
- JPRN-UMIN000045983
- Lead Sponsor
- Toyohashi heart center
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 200
Not provided
1) Patients with acute lower limb ischemia or acute thrombosis 2) Patients with a history of stent placement for the target blood vessel 3) Patients with non-arteriosclerotic stenosis and obstructive lesions 4) Patients who have difficulty taking antiplatelet drugs / anticoagulants 5) Chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) Rutherford classification 5 or 6 6) When the doctor in charge judges that it is inappropriate 7) Cases in which blood vessels cannot be visualized with EVUS
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Primary patency rate (at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 36 months, 48 months, 60 months)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Freedom from TLR MACLE Wire passage route evaluated by IVUS Degree of dissection after balloon dilation, angiographic findings, IVUS findings Procedure time, radiation exposure, contrast medium usage Procedure complications Improvement of patient symptoms by Rutherford classification Improvement of ABI