A Retrospective Study on the Effect of Surgery on Hip Diseases

• Conditions: Femoroacetabular Impingement; Acetabular Labral Tear
• Interventions: Procedure: hip arthroscopy

• Registration Number: NCT04992806
• Lead Sponsor: Peking University Third Hospital

Brief Summary

To study the effect of arthroscopy on the treatment of hip diseases and to evaluate the regularity and treatment of hip joint diseases.

Detailed Description

To study the clinical effect of arthroscopic treatment in patients with hip disease, a retrospective study was conducted on 600 patients with hip disease from January 2011 to January 2016. All patients underwent preoperative examinations. These included preoperative supine anteroposterior hip radiographs, cross-lateral radiographs, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging.Preoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs), including visual analogue scale (VAS), international hip prognostic instrument-12 (IHOT-12), and modified Harris hip score (MHHS), were evaluated at 1, 2, and 5 years after surgery.

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2020-06-01
• Primary Completion: 2020-12-01
• Status Verified: 2021-06
• Study First Submitted: 2021-06-27
• Study First Submitted QC: 2021-07-29
• Last Update Submitted: 2021-07-29
• Study First Posted: 2021-08-05
• Last Update Posted: 2021-08-05
• Study Completion: 2021-12-01

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: UNKNOWN
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 600

Inclusion Criteria

• The patient received imaging examination before surgery and was diagnosed with hip joint labrum injury, FAI and other hip joint diseases, and the patient complained of pain in the hip joint, buttocks or thigh. Conservative treatment is ineffective for more than 6 months.

Read More

Exclusion Criteria

• History of hip surgery, hip osteoarthritis, femoral head necrosis, hip infection, rheumatic disease, lumbar disease, ankylosing spondylitis, or sacroiliac joint disease.

Read More

Study & Design

• Study Type: OBSERVATIONAL
• Study Design: Not specified

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
patients accepted hip arthroscopy	hip arthroscopy	patients with hip diseases and accepted hip arthroscopy in Peking University Third Hospital

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
The patient was followed up at 1 year after surgery to evaluate the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).	1 year after operation	Visual Analog Scale (VAS), The highest score was 10, and the lowest was 0. The higher the score, the more obvious the pain.
The patient was followed up at 2 years after surgery to evaluate the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).	2 years after operation	Visual Analog Scale (VAS), The highest score was 10, and the lowest was 0. The higher the score, the more obvious the pain.
The patient was followed up at 5 years after surgery to evaluate the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).	5 years after operation	Visual Analog Scale (VAS), The highest score was 10, and the lowest was 0. The higher the score, the more obvious the pain.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
The patient was followed up at 1 year after surgery to evaluate the International Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT-12).	1 year after operation	The International Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT-12).The highest score was 120, and the lowest was 0. The higher the score, the better the postoperative recovery.
The patient was followed up at 2 years after surgery to evaluate the International Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT-12).	2 years after operation	The International Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT-12).The highest score was 120, and the lowest was 0. The higher the score, the better the postoperative recovery.
The patient was followed up at 5 years after surgery to evaluate the International Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT-12).	5 years after operation	The International Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT-12).The highest score was 120, and the lowest was 0. The higher the score, the better the postoperative recovery.
The patient was followed up at 1 year after surgery to evaluate modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS).	1 year after operation	Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS).The highest score was 44, and the lowest was 0. The higher the score, the better the postoperative recovery.
The patient was followed up at 2 years after surgery to evaluate modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS).	2 years after operation	Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS).The highest score was 44, and the lowest was 0. The higher the score, the better the postoperative recovery.
The patient was followed up at 5 years after surgery to evaluate modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS).	5 years after operation	Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS).The highest score was 44, and the lowest was 0. The higher the score, the better the postoperative recovery.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Peking University Third Hospital; 🇨🇳 Beijing, China