Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03405259
NCT03405259CompletedNot Applicable

A Pilot Clinical Study to Compare Professional Treatments for Dentinal Hypersensitivity

Procter and Gamble0 sites22 target enrollmentStarted: June 26, 2013Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Sponsor
Enrollment
22
Primary Endpoint
Change From Baseline Air Challenge

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The objective of this study is to compare professional treatments for dentinal hypersensitivity immediately following a single, professionally-applied treatment and again approximately 2 months following treatment.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Participant)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • be at least 18 years of age;
  • provide written informed consent prior to participation and be given a signed copy of the informed consent form;
  • be in good general health as determined by the Investigator/designee; and
  • have at least one tooth with a VAS score of greater than or equal to 30 in response to the air challenge.

Exclusion Criteria

  • allergy to rosin or to pine nuts;
  • self-reported pregnancy or nursing;
  • severe periodontal disease, as characterized by purulent exudate, generalized mobility, and/or severe recession;
  • active treatment for periodontitis;
  • fixed facial orthodontic appliances;
  • any diseases or conditions that might interfere with the safe completion of the study; or
  • an inability to undergo any study procedures.

Arms & Interventions

Super Seal® Desensitizer

Experimental

Professionally Applied

Intervention: Super Seal® Desensitizer (Device)

Acclean® Fluoride Varnish

Sham Comparator

Professionally Applied

Intervention: Acclean® Fluoride Varnish (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change From Baseline Air Challenge

Time Frame: Within 5 minutes after treatment was applied

The Schiff Sensitivity Scale was assessed for each test tooth via an evaporative air challenge. The examiner recorded the Schiff Index score corresponding to the response to the air challenge. The Schiff Index Sensitivity scale is scored as follows- 0: tooth/subject did not respond to stimulus, 1: tooth/subject responds to stimulus, but does not request discontinuation of stimulus, 2: tooth/subject responds to stimulus and requests discontinuation or moves form stimulus, 3: tooth/subject responds to stimulus, considers stimulus to be painful, and requests discontinuation of the stimulus. A negative change from Baseline score represents a decrease in sensitivity from baseline.The mean change from Baseline was calculated for this measure.

Change From Baseline Visual Analog Scale

Time Frame: Within 5 minutes after treatment was applied

Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - subjects are asked to look at a VAS and designate the level of hypersensitivity they experienced as a result of the thermal and water challenges using a continuum scale of 0 = No tooth pain up to 100 = Worst tooth pain ever experienced. A negative change from Baseline score represents a decrease in sensitivity from baseline.

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor
Procter and Gamble
Sponsor Class
Industry
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Similar Trials