MedPath

HYpofractionated, Dose-redistributed RAdiotherapy With Protons and Photons in HNSCC

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Radiotherapy
Immune System Suppression
Hypofractionation
Proton Therapy
Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Interventions
Radiation: conventional fractionated radiotherapy
Radiation: HYpofractionated, Dose-redistributed RAdiotherapy (HYDRA)
Registration Number
NCT05364411
Lead Sponsor
Joris B.W. Elbers
Brief Summary

Radiotherapy for advanced-stage head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) results in an unfavorable 5-year overall survival of 40%, and there is a strong biological rationale for improving outcome by combinatorial treatment with immunotherapy. However, also immunosuppressive effects of radiotherapy have been reported and recently a randomized phase-III trial failed to show any survival benefit following the combination of a PD-L1 inhibitor with chemoradiotherapy. The hypothesis is that the combination of these individually effective treatments failed because of radiation-induced lymphodepletion and that the key therefore lies in reforming conventional radiotherapy, which typically consists of large lymphotoxic radiation fields of 35 fractions. By integrating modern radiobiology and individually established innovative radiotherapy concepts, the patient's immune system could be maximally retained. This will be achieved by 1) increasing the radiation dose per fraction so that the total number of fractions can be reduced (HYpofractionation), 2) by redistributing the radiation dose towards a higher peak dose within the tumor center and a lowered elective-field dose (Dose-redistribution) and 3) by using RAdiotherapy with protons instead of photons (HYDRA).

The objectives of this study are to determine the safety of HYDRA with protons and photons by conducting two parallel phase-I trials. HYDRA's efficacy will be compared to standard of care (SOC). The immune effects of HYDRA-protons will be evaluated by longitudinal immune profiling and compared to HYDRA-photons and SOC (with protons and photons). There will be a specific focus on actionable immune targets and their temporal patterns that can be tested in future hypofractionated-immunotherapy combination trials. This trial therefore is an important step towards future personalized immuno-radiotherapy combinations with the ultimate goal to improve survival for patients with HNSCC.

Detailed Description

The HYDRA dose prescriptions are, in 20 fractions (instead of the conventional 35 fractions):

* Inhomogeneous focal boost on the macroscopic gross tumor volume (GTVprimary tumor and GTVnodes) on FDG-PET: mean dose 59Gy, max dose 63Gy.

* The mean dose of 59Gy corresponds to an equal late normal tissue toxicity probability after conventionally fractionated radiotherapy of 70Gy in 35 fractions, considering an α/β=3 for normal tissue.

* Simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) on the clinical target volume (CTV-P1 = GTV+5mm): 55Gy

* Elective field / CTV-P2 (GTV+10mm): 40Gy

Patients who receive the HYDRA intervention treatment, as well as patients who receive standard of care may require the addition of a concurrent radiosensitizer based on clinicopathological features according to standard of care. Currently, the only two registered radiosensitizers are platinum-based chemotherapy (cisplatin/carboplatin) and cetuximab. These radiosensitizers should be administered according to standard care treatment protocols.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
100
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Conventional fractionated photon therapyconventional fractionated radiotherapygroup 4, n=25 run at Erasmus MC
Conventional fractionated proton therapyconventional fractionated radiotherapygroup 2, n=25, run at HollandPTC
HYDRA-protonsHYpofractionated, Dose-redistributed RAdiotherapy (HYDRA)group 1, n=25, run at HollandPTC
HYDRA-photonsHYpofractionated, Dose-redistributed RAdiotherapy (HYDRA)group 3, n=25 run at Erasmus MC
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Safety of HYDRA-protons and HYDRA-photons in terms of radiation-induced grade 3-4 late toxicity, physician-reported by CTCAE v5.0, monitored until 1 year after the last patient has completed HYDRA.month 1-36

HYDRA is randomized with standard of care for translational research purposes; a direct comparison of toxicity will statistically not be conclusive and is outside the scope of this study.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Objective response after HYDRA defined by radiological response on CT-scans or MRI in comparison to standard of caremonth 1-27

Objective response rate 3 months after HYDRA (group 1 and 3), defined by radiological response on CT-scans or MRI using RECIST version 1.1 and/or histopathological confirmation of residual disease, in comparison to standard of care (group 2 and 4, respectively), 3 months after end of treatment

Efficacy of HYDRA in terms of in-field and nodal elective field tumor control at 1 yearmonth 24-36

Efficacy of HYDRA (group 1 and 3) in terms of in-field and nodal elective field tumor control, 1 year after the last patient is included, in comparison to group 2 and 4, respectively.

Immune profile (changes) between all 4 treatment groupsmonth 1-27

Numbers and phenotype of peripheral immune cell populations in blood at baseline, related to patient- and tumor characteristics, and differences between temporal changes of these immune markers during/after treatment at 6 timepoints in group 1-4.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Erasmus MC

🇳🇱

Rotterdam, Zuid Holland, Netherlands

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath