Optimal Dose of Combination of Rocuronium and Cisatracurium

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: Anesthesia; Chronic Otitis Media
• Interventions: Drug: 10% reduction of combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex®; Drug: 20% reduction of combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex®

• Registration Number: NCT02495038
• Lead Sponsor: Yonsei University

Brief Summary

BACKGROUND: The combinations of rocuronium and cisatracurium have a synergic effect. The investigators studied whether the prediction is possible to have a sufficient effect of reducing the dose when combining the two neuromuscular blocking agents through monitoring neuromuscular relaxation during surgery.

METHODS: Each group were intubating dose group (Group I, n=27) combined Effective Dose (ED)95 rocuronium and ED95 cisatracurium, small amount reducing group (Group S, n=27) reduced 10% of each ED95 and large amount reducing group (Group L, n=27) reduced 20% of each ED95. Before patients arrived in the operating room, rocuronium and cisatracurium were prepared by a nurse who was not involved in this study. Each study drug was administrated to the patient and timer was started with TOF-Watch® monitoring. Train-of-four (TOF) of the ulnar nerve was used as setting of 2 Hz per 12 sec. The investigators checked time to TOF ratio=0 (Onset), time to 1st TOF ratio\>25% (Duration 25%) and TOF 25-75% (recovery index) under total i.v. anesthesia (TIVA). One way ANOVA was used for statistical analysis (α=0.05, β=0.2).

Detailed Description

Introduction:

Rocuronium and cisatracurium are representative neuromuscular blocking agents used widely because the former have features of fast onset of peak effect and short duration of muscle relaxation relatively while the latter have comparatively long duration relaxation time and break down by Hofmann elimination and ester hydrolysis. A combination of the two have a synergic effect may be also used with either the priming method for rapid sequence intubation. It would contribute both to determine the effective combination rate clinically and to predict the pharmacokinetic characteristics that determine how much the synergistic effect of this combination. The investigators studied whether the prediction is possible to have a sufficient effect of reducing the dose when combining the two muscle relaxants through monitoring muscle relaxation during surgery.

Materials and methods:

This study was conducted to 81 patients scheduled for elective mastoidectomy and tympanoplasty after obtaining written informed consent. All patients included the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II, aged 20-60, BMI 20-30 kg/m2. The exclusion criteria were as follows: a history of allergy to the study drugs, neuromuscular disease, pregnancy or breast-feeding, preoperative medication of antipsychotics or neuroleptics known to interact with non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs), serum creatinine level\>1.2 mg/dL, liver transaminase\>40 U/L. Anthropometric variables such as height, weight were measured in ward before surgery. BMI calculated as total body weight divided by the squared height. Ideal body weight (IBW) was calculated by the formula of Devine {50 kg + 2.3 × (height \[inch\]-60) for man and 45.5 kg + 2.3 × (height \[inch\]-60) for woman} and used to administrate NMBAs of initial dose. Lean body weight (LBW) was calculated by the formula of James {LBW (men) = (1.10 × Weight(kg)) - 128 × ( Weight2 / (100 × Height(m))2), (women) = (1.07 × Weight(kg)) - 148 × ( Weight2 / (100 × Height(m))2)}. Additive dose of NMBAs was administrated by LBW. Patients were randomly assigned to each group by opening of sealed allocation envelope. Each group were intubating dose group (Group I, n=27) combined ED95 rocuronium and ED95 cisatracurium, small amount reducing group (Group S, n=27) reduced 10% of each ED95 and large amount reducing group (Group L, n=27) reduced 20% of each ED95.

Monitoring and Medication:

In the operating room, monitoring was accomplished to patients with a noninvasive blood pressure, pulse oximetry, electrocardiography, thermometer, Bispectral Index (BIS VISTA Monitoring System; Aspect Medical Systems Inc, Norwood, MA, USA), and T1/T4 ratio used TOF-Watch® (Organon, Teknica B.V., Boxtel, the Netherlands). Every 5 min, measured things are recorded.

Premedications with midazolam 2 mg and glycopyrrolate 0.2 mg were administrated to patients intramuscularly 1 h before surgery. Before patients arrived in the operating room, rocuronium and cisatracurium were prepared by a nurse who was not involved in this study. The syringe containing each study drug was conveyed to the performer of this study as the status of shielding the scale. The syringes of rocuronium and cisatracurium used each other syringe. Anesthesia was induced with propofol 1.5-2.5 mg/kg, remifentanil 0.4-0.6 mcg/kg, afterward maintained with target controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol 5-10 mg/kg/hr and remifentanil 0.05-2 mcg/kg/min. The infusion pump (Orchestra Module DPS, Fresenius-Vial, Brezins, France) was operated with Minto's and Marshall's pharmacokinetic model for effect site TCI of remifentanil and propofol.

The opposite arm against operation side was used for neuromuscular monitoring and attached to armboard of TOF-Watch®. Each study drug was administrated to the patient and timer was started with T1/T4 ratio monitoring. The surface electrodes of ulnar nerve placed at the wrist and Train-of-four (TOF) stimulation was used as setting of supramaximal square wave impulses with 200μs duration, 2 Hz per 12sec. The investigators checked times to TOF ratio=0 (Onset), 1st TOF ratio\>25% (Duration 25%) and TOF 25-75% (Recovery Index), recovery time of 90% (TOF 25-90%) under total i.v. anesthesia (TIVA). Also the investigators checked the rate of additional rescue dose administrated with 10% of initial NMBAs dose, operation time from incision to surgical wound dressing, anesthesia time from entering to going out the operation room. Body temperature was maintained above 35°C using warm air blanket. The arterial pressure cuff was placed on the opposite arm against TOF monitoring.

Adverse Events and Management:

In all patients, anesthesia level was assessed based on a BIS score of 40-60. Moderate hypertension (\>120% of baseline) or hypotension (\<80% of baseline) was treated by increasing or decreasing rate of propofol infusion with fluid supplement. Severe hemodynamic change (systolic pressure \< 90 mmHg or \> 200 mmHg) was controlled by intravenous (IV) administration of phenylephrine 50 mcg or nicardipine 250 mcg repeatedly until being hemodynamic stable status. Unexpectedly, when hiccup or self-contained respiration was showed, additional rescue dose of NMBAs was administrated to the patient even though T1/T4 ratio was lower than 25%.

Statistical Analysis:

All data are expressed as means ± standard deviations (SDs), numbers (percentages), or medians (upper and lower quartiles), as appropriate. Data between the groups were compared using the χ2 test, Fisher exact test, independent t test, or the Mann-Whitney U test, as appropriate. To assess data normality, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was performed on the data set. According to a preliminary study, 24 patients would be required in each group with a power of 0.9 and a type I error of 0.05. Factoring in a drop-out rate of 10%, the investigators calculated that 27 patients would be required for each group. All statistical analyses were performed with the SPSS 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) program. A P value \<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2014-03
• Primary Completion: 2015-02
• Study Completion: 2015-02
• Study First Submitted: 2015-06-04
• Study First Submitted QC: 2015-07-10
• Study First Posted: 2015-07-13
• Results First Submitted: 2017-10-02
• Results First Submitted QC: 2017-11-21
• Results First Posted: 2017-12-20
• Status Verified: 2018-01
• Last Update Submitted: 2018-01-31
• Last Update Posted: 2018-03-02

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 81

Inclusion Criteria

• the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II
• BMI 20-30 kg/m2
• Patients scheduled for mastoidectomy and tympanoplasty.

Read More

Exclusion Criteria

• a history of allergy to the study drugs,
• neuromuscular disease,
• pregnancy
• breast-feeding,
• preoperative medication of antipsychotics or neuroleptics known to interact with NMBAs
• serum creatinine level>1.2 mg/dL,
• liver transaminase>40 U/L.

Read More

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
10% reduction of combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex®, Group S	10% reduction of combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex®	This arm reduced 10% of combined ED95 rocuronium and ED95 cisatracurium
20% reduction of combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex®, Group L	20% reduction of combination of Esmeron® and Nimbex®	This arm reduced 20% of combined ED95 rocuronium and ED95 cisatracurium

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Onset of Neuromuscular Blocking Agents(NMBAs)	Intraoperative, an average of 5 minutes	Time from administration of initial NMBAs to Train-of-four (TOF) ratio=0, assessed up to 15 minutes during general anesthesia.
Duration 25% of Neuromuscular Blocking Agents(NMBAs)	Intraoperative, an average of 1 hours	Time from administration of initial NMBAs to Train-of-four (TOF) ratio \>25%, assessed up to 2 hours during general anesthesia.
Recovery Index of Neuromuscular Blocking Agents(NMBAs)	Intraoperative, an average of 20 minutes	Time from TOF ratio 25% to 75%, assessed up to 1 hour during general anesthesia.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Operation Time	Intraoperative, an average of 3 hours.	Time from skin incision to wound dressing assessed up to 8 hours.
Anesthetic Time	Intraoperative, an average 4 hours.	Time from induction to recovery of anesthesia, asessed up to 3 hours.
Additional Rescue Doses Per Hour Ratio.	Intraoperative, an average of 3 hours.	Additional Rescue Doses Per Hour Ratio is the number per hour of addition of rescue dose administrated with 10% of initial NMBAs dose. The formula is {(Addition number + 1 / Anesthetic time) x 60}.