Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01693354
NCT01693354UnknownNot Applicable

Mid-dilution Hemodiafiltration International Randomized Prospective Study on Incident Patients Focused on Outcome

IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna4 sites in 4 countries500 target enrollmentStarted: September 1, 2012Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Enrollment
500
Locations
4
Primary Endpoint
crude, all-causes mortality

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether mid-dilution hemodiafiltration is effective in the reduction of the crude mortality risk in patients who have been undergoing renal replacement treatment for less than 1 year. Patients will be randomized since the beginning of the study in two groups: standard HF dialysis and mid-dilution HDF.

Detailed Description

It is a matter of fact that in the last decades the Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) population has widely changed. In Italy, for example, more than 50% of the incident dialysis patients are more than 70 year old, with diabetic and hypertension being the major underlying diseases; moreover a great percentage of the patients starts dialysis with a burden of at least 1-2 comorbidities [1]. Online hemodiafiltration (online HDF) has been recently associated with better patient survival in comparison with standard hemodialysis in two large trials [2,3]; the overall relative risk of mortality was found to be approximately 33% lower in patients treated with online HDF [2,3]. These impressive results were not obtained anyway on the whole population, but in a sub-group analysis. A strong correlation was found between the total convective volume obtained and the mortality risk reduction; HDF was found to be significantly better than standard hemodialysis when a total convective volume of 19-22 L/session (in 4 hours sessions of post-dilution HDF) was achieved.

These results support the importance of the "adequate convective dose" concept in order to improve the patient outcomes especially in frail patients, as recently demonstrated by a large randomised control trial, the MPO study [4], comparing High Flux versus Low Flux dialysis in patients with plasma albumin levels equal to or less than 4 gr/dl ( as a marker of patient comorbidities) and, in a post hoc analysis, in diabetic patients [4].

Mid-dilution HDF is a variant of classical HDF combining simultaneous pre- and post.-dilution in order to maximise middle and large solutes removal.

The MILESTONE study would aim to fully demonstrate for mid-dilution HDF the significant mortality risk reduction observed in the recent mentioned studies.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •On a thrice/week RRT for at least 3 months
  • •Dialysis vintage > 3 months
  • •Signed informed consent
  • •Blood flow > 300 mL/min

Exclusion Criteria

  • •On waiting list for living-donor transplant
  • •Residual diuresis > 500 mL/day
  • •Inability, as judget by the investigator, to follow or understand the protocol instructions
  • •Active neoplastic disease
  • •Single needle treatment
  • •Patients with expectancy life lower than 6 months
  • •Inclusion to other studies
  • •Pregnancy

Arms & Interventions

HF dialysis

Active Comparator

HF (high-flux) dialysis is standard hemodialysis treatment performed by using a high permeability dialyzer instead of a low permeability one.

Intervention: HF dialysis (Device)

Mid-dilution HDF

Experimental

Mid-dilution is a newly developed hemodiafiltration therapy able to allow a simultaneous pre- and post-dilution infusion.

Intervention: Mid-dilution HDF (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

crude, all-causes mortality

Time Frame: 5 years

The primary objective will be assessed by the incidence rate of fatal events

Secondary Outcomes

  • Quality of life and dialysis tolerance evaluated by questionnaire(1 year)
  • Micro-inflammation evaluation(1 year)
  • Cardiovascular morbidity(5 years)
  • Nutrition and anaemia management(1 year)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Antonio Santoro

Professor Antonio Santoro MD, Chief of Nephrology

IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna

Study Sites (4)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials