Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04254224
NCT04254224RecruitingNot Applicable

Scandinavian Diverticulitis Trial SCANDIV II: Treatment of Acute Complicated Diverticulitis: a Prospective Observational Study

Uppsala University1 site in 1 country500 target enrollmentStarted: April 10, 2018Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Recruiting
Sponsor
Enrollment
500
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Treatment in complicated diverticulitis

Study Overview

Brief Summary

This study focuses on the treatment for complicated diverticulitis classified as Hinchey I-IV.

The aim of this prospective observational study is to evaluate type of treatment and the success rate of treatment in acute complicated diverticulitis (ACD) at participating hospitals in Sweden and Norway. Furthermore, the effects on quality of life for this patient group will be evaluated.

Detailed Description

Diverticular disease is among the five most common gastrointestinal disorders. Among individuals with diverticulosis the lifetime risk of suffering from diverticulitis is between 4 and 25%. The most common complications of diverticulitis are perforation, abscess formation, fistula and obstruction. Emergency surgery is necessary in up to 25% of diverticulitis patients.

The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeon (ASCRS, 2014) recommends abscess drainage and antibiotic treatment and later elective surgery as treatment for complicated diverticulitis, Hinchey I and II (*) for abscesses larger or equal to 5 cm while others recommend resection surgery only for Hinchey II patients. The recommendations for surgery are motivated by the belief that surgical treatment will reduce the risk for relapsing disease with intra-abdominal/pelvic sepsis by more than 40%. However, these recommendations are based on small and out-dated retrospective studies.

Perforated diverticulitis with radiologically confirmed free intraperitoneal air is a life threatening disease with significant mortality and morbidity therefore several guidelines recommend acute surgical intervention. However, a conservative non-surgical approach for the treatment of perforated diverticulitis has been shown to be effective for hemodynamically stable patients with radiologically confirmed free air. A Swedish study recently showed the incidence of complicated diverticulitis to be 9/100.000 inhabitants/year of which about one third required acute surgical intervention. The most common operation in perforated diverticulitis is Hartman's procedure, which involves removal of the involved sigmoid segment, a terminal colostomy and blind closure of the rectal stump. Also primary resection of the sigmoid colon with anastomosis is frequently used, sometimes combined with a loop-ileostomy. Laparoscopic lavage without resection has emerged as an alternative operation method. However, the SCANDIV trial showed limitations of laparoscopic lavage with a higher frequency of re-operation in the lavage group compared to primary resection after 90 days. Nevertheless, several meta-analysis based on three randomized studies showed comparable rates regarding overall mortality and morbidity in laparoscopic lavage versus resection in perforated diverticulitis.

For patients with diverticulitis complicated by fistula (colovesical, colovaginal or colo cutaneous) surgery is the recommended treatment. This condition, however, rarely presents in an acute setting.

In Scandinavia a conservative approach restricted to antibiotics and percutaneous drainage is widely accepted as solitary treatment for patients with diverticular abscesses (Hinchey I and II). Also hemodynamically stable and non-immunocompromised patients with perforated diverticulitis (Hinchey III) are often managed conservatively with antibiotics and, if required, percutaneous drainage. Acute surgical intervention is performed if the condition of the patient deteriorates during hospital stay or if the CT shows signs of faecal peritonitis (Hinchey IV). Elective surgery for patients after an episode of acute complicated diverticulitis (Hinchey I-III) is usually reserved for patients with frequent relapses or with a persisting diverticular abscess.

Study Design

Study Type
Observational
Observational Model
Cohort
Time Perspective
Prospective

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Clinical symptoms and laboratory results suspicious for diverticulitis
  • CT findings of complicated diverticulitis with extraluminal air, presence of abscess with or without fistula or operative findings of complicated diverticulitis in an emergency setting

Exclusion Criteria

  • patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis
  • unable to give informed consent.
  • language barrier

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Treatment in complicated diverticulitis

Time Frame: 1year

Surgery or conservative managment

Treatment failure

Time Frame: 1year

Complications, reoperation, readmission, recurrence , mortality

Secondary Outcomes

  • Stoma(1 year)
  • Evaluation of guality of Life(1 years)

Investigators

Sponsor
Uppsala University
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

achabok

Ass. prof. Abbas Chabok Head of colorectal unit Surgical department Västmanlands Hospital and Centre for clinical research Uppsala University

Uppsala University

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Scandinavian Diverticulitis Trial... | Clinical Trial