跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02644356
NCT02644356已完成1 期

Palliative Care Provider Online Education in Evidence-Based Complementary Therapies

Collinge and Associates, Inc.0 个研究点目标入组 51 人开始时间: 2011年7月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
1 期
状态
已完成
入组人数
51
主要终点
Change in Test Scores on Knowledge of Course Content From Baseline to 30 Days

研究概览

简要总结

Palliative care represents one of the most rapidly expanding sectors of health care. Its rapid growth has been accompanied by widespread needs for training of multidisciplinary personnel to work with the unique set of health issues specific to its population of patients - not only those at end-of-life, but also patients with long-term, incurable, chronic and degenerative illnesses. This project will develop the first online continuing education program for palliative care personnel in the evidence-based application of complementary therapies, to enhance patient care and quality of life in the palliative care setting.

详细描述

Palliative care represents one of the most rapidly expanding sectors of health care. Its rapid growth has been accompanied by widespread needs for training of multidisciplinary personnel to work with the unique set of health issues specific to its population of patients - not only those at end-of-life, but also patients with long-term, incurable, chronic and degenerative illnesses. Selected complementary therapies offer significant benefits for reducing suffering and improving quality of life in palliative care patients; however, there currently are no systematic educational offerings on the evidence-based application of such therapies in the palliative care setting. This project will develop the first online continuing education program for palliative care personnel in the evidence-based application of complementary therapies in the palliative care setting. The final product will consist of an interactive course with eight modules; Phase I will develop the web infrastructure for the course, and will then pilot test two modules to establish feasibility of the concept. The specific aims are as follows: Aim 1. Build a website capable of delivering an online interactive educational curriculum. Aim 2. Conduct evidence-based reviews of the literature on the application of complementary therapies to pain and dyspnea in palliative care settings. Aim 3. Incorporate the course content into a structure and form that can be effectively delivered over the website. Aim 4. Conduct peer review evaluation of content to determine fidelity of course content with available evidence. Aim 5. Recruit a multidisciplinary sample of health care personnel practicing in the field of palliative care. Aim 6. Conduct pilot testing of two modules of the program. Aim 7. Evaluate {attitudinal and} learning outcomes and user satisfaction feedback to determine feasibility of the approach. Feasibility of the approach will be determined by success in recruitment, compliance, evidence of meeting user learning objectives, and user satisfaction data. The final product to be developed is an eight-module online educational course for multidisciplinary health professionals in the evidence-based application of complementary therapies in palliative care. Commercial application will be as a continuing education program that is licensed to institutions (care facilities, hospitals, universities, colleges) as well as purchased by individual users (fee-based), with discipline-specific continuing education credits available, all administered over the internet. Impact and Innovation: This will be the first online educational program for palliative care personnel on this topic available in the US. The course will spearhead the expansion of the existing paradigm of palliative care to incorporate evidence-based integration of complementary therapies. Technological innovation includes the employment of fluid updating of content to licensees, which is a new development in online education and particularly important given the rapid rate of emergence of new data. Public health benefit: The course will aid in the improvement of quality of palliative care, benefitting potentially millions of recipients in the most rapidly expanding sector of the health care system.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Other
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Physicians (MD, DO), physician assistant (PA), nurse practitioner (NP), registered nurse (RN), licensed practical nurse (LPN), social worker (BA/BS/BSW, MSW, PhD/DSW), psychologist (MS/MA, PhD/PsyD), counselor (MS/MA),administrator, and chaplain.
  • Must be currently active within palliative care settings.

排除标准

  • Professionals not actively working in palliative care settings

结局指标

主要结局

Change in Test Scores on Knowledge of Course Content From Baseline to 30 Days

时间窗: Baseline, 30 days

Investigator-generated test of change in knowledge about theory, mechanisms of action, delivery, indications for use, evidence of efficacy; total of 45 multiple choice questions covering three modalities: acupuncture, massage, and music interventions. Range of total possible correct responses was from 0-45, with subscores as follows: range for acupuncture, 0-15; massage, 0-16; music interventions, 0-14. Total score is the sum of the combined subscores.

次要结局

  • Change in Ratings of Confidence in Understanding a Modality's Safety Considerations in PC From Baseline to 30 Days(Baseline, 30 days)
  • Change in Ratings of Confidence in Making Evidence-based Recommendations for the Modality in PC Planning From Baseline to 30 Days(Baseline, 30 days)
  • Perceived Course Relevance: Potential of Course to Contribute to Improved Patient Care(30 day follow-up)
  • Perceived Course Relevance: Increasing Knowledge of Non-pharmacological Approaches(30 day follow-up)
  • Change in Ratings of Confidence in Explaining the Modality From Baseline to 30 Days(Baseline, 30 days)
  • Perceived Course Relevance: Importance of Knowledge About Non-pharmacological Approaches(30 day follow-up)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

William Collinge, PhD

President

Collinge and Associates, Inc.

相似试验