Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04191993
NCT04191993
Completed
N/A

A Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing the Direct Superior Approach Versus the Posterior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty

University College, London1 site in 1 country80 target enrollmentJune 12, 2018

Overview

Phase
N/A
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Surgery
Sponsor
University College, London
Enrollment
80
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Pain in hip at 24 hours following surgery
Status
Completed
Last Updated
2 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) is a highly effective treatment for patients with symptomatic hip osteoarthritis. The surgical approach in THA is important as it influences postoperative clinical recovery, functional outcomes, and implant positioning [1]. The evolution of surgical techniques in THA has led to the development of minimally invasive surgery, which is performed through smaller skin incisions, reduced soft tissue disruption and greater muscle preservation [2-10]. This prospective, randomised control study compares clinical and radiological outcomes in THA performed using the standard posterior approach (PA) and its less invasive modification, the direct superior approach (DSA). The study will include 80 patients with hip osteoarthritis undergoing THA. Following informed consent, patients will be randomised to one of the two treatment groups, and undergo THA using either the PA or DSA. The control group includes patients undergoing THA through the PA while the investigation group includes patients undergoing THA with the DSA. A further 25 patients randomly selected from each treatment group will undergo radiosteriometric analysis (RSA) to assess differences in early implant migration between PA and DSA groups.

Clinical and radiological outcomes of interest will be recorded by blinded observers at regular intervals for 2 years after surgery. The findings of this study will enable an improved understanding of differences in postoperative clinical recovery, functional outcomes, and implant positioning in THA performed using the DSA compared to the PA approach.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
June 12, 2018
End Date
December 31, 2022
Last Updated
2 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patient has hip osteoarthritis requiring primary THA
  • Patient and surgeon are in agreement that THA is the most appropriate treatment
  • Patient is fit for surgical intervention following review by surgeon and anaesthetist
  • Patient age: Patients 18-80 years of age inclusive
  • Gender: male and female
  • Patient must be capable of giving informed consent and agree to comply with the postoperative review program
  • Patient must be a permanent resident in an area accessible to the study site
  • Patient must have sufficient postoperative mobility to attend follow-up clinics and allow for radiographs to be taken

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patient is not suitable for primary THA e.g. patient requires revision surgery for previously failed THA
  • Patient is not medically fit for surgical intervention
  • Patients under the age of 18 or over 80 years of age
  • Patient is immobile or has another neurological condition affecting musculoskeletal function
  • Patient is already enrolled on another concurrent clinical trial
  • Patient is unable or unwilling to sign the informed consent form specific to this study
  • Patient is unable to attend the follow-up programme
  • Patient is non-resident in local area or expected to leave the catchment area postoperatively

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Pain in hip at 24 hours following surgery

Time Frame: 24 hours

Pain at 24 hours following surgery as assessed using the visual analogue scale between patients undergoing PA for THA versus DSA for THA.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Operating time(During the operation)
  • Time to discharge(6 weeks post operation)
  • Analgesia requirements(inpatient admission and postoperatively at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years.)
  • Oxford Hip Score (OHS)(Pre-op; 6 weeks post-op; 6 months post-op; 1 year post-op; 2 years post-op)
  • Hip injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS)(Pre-op; 6 weeks post-op; 6 months post-op; 1 year post-op; 2 years post-op)
  • European Quality of Life questionnaire with 5 dimensions for adults (EQ-5D)(Pre-op; 6 weeks post-op; 6 months post-op; 1 year post-op; 2 years post-op)
  • Harris Hip Score [HHS](Pre-op; 6 weeks post-op; 6 months post-op; 1 year post-op; 2 years post-op)
  • Mobilisation distance(inpatient admission and postoperatively at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years.)
  • Use of mobility aids(inpatient admission and postoperatively at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years.)
  • Femoral and acetabular implant early migration(postoperatively at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years.)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials