MedPath

Thoracodorsal Artery Perforator Flap Versus Conventional Free Flaps

Not Applicable
Conditions
Trauma
Registration Number
NCT03658603
Lead Sponsor
Assiut University
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of the thoracodorsal artery perforator flap versus other conventional free flaps for reconstruction of soft tissue defects.

Detailed Description

The field of plastic surgery, unlike most other surgical specialties, has no anatomic or functional area to which it can lay claim; the plastic surgeon practices methods and techniques applicable to all specialties and anatomic areas.

Reconstructive surgery is the process of restoring the human body to "whole" following tumor extirpation, infection, trauma or congenital or acquired deformity - restoring both form and function.

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of the thoracodorsal artery perforator flap versus other conventional free flaps for reconstruction of soft tissue defects.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
40
Inclusion Criteria

• Soft tissue loss anywhere in the body.

Exclusion Criteria

• Patients with chronic debilitating diseases e.g. chronic renal failure, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
The mean operative time12 hours

the time from the start to the end of operation

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
The percentage of patients with Flap viability1 week

The perforator flap will be assessed regarding (color, temperature, capillary refilling, congestion, blistering)

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.