Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06382363
NCT06382363CompletedNot Applicable

Improving T2DM Detection Among At-Risk Individuals - Effectiveness of Active Opportunistic Screening Using Spot Capillary-HbA1c Test - a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial (DM-REACH)

The University of Hong Kong8 sites in 1 country852 target enrollmentStarted: June 11, 2022Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
852
Locations
8
Primary Endpoint
Proportional difference in detection of T2DM

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of active opportunistic screening using point-of-care capillary Hemoglobin-A1c (POC-cHbA1c) testing, compared to venous HbA1c (vHbA1c) testing, in improving detection of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) among at-risk primary care patients.

Design: Pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial.

Setting: 8 public primary care clinics in Hong Kong.

Participants: A minimum of 776 patients (97 per clinic) who have ≥1 risk factor for T2DM, but no known diagnosis of DM or DM screening in the past 12 months.

Intervention: Participants at intervention clinics (n=4) will be offered free POC-cHbA1c testing on-site, immediately informed of test results and DM risk, and scheduled for confirmatory oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) if screened positive (i.e. HbA1c≥5.6%). Participants at control clinics will be offered free vHbA1c testing scheduled on a separate day, informed of test results and DM risk via phone, and scheduled for confirmatory OGTT if screened positive.

Main outcome measures: Primary outcomes are uptake rate of POC-cHbA1c versus vHba1c testing, and difference in proportion of T2DM detected between intervention and control groups.

Secondary outcomes include number-needed-to-screen to detect one more T2DM case.

Data analysis: Participants' characteristics and test uptake rates will be summarized by descriptive statistics. Difference in the proportion of T2DM detected between groups will be compared using Chi-squared test. Number-needed-to screen to identify one additional patient with DM will be calculated.

Expected results: A greater proportion of T2DM patients will be detected by POC-cHbA1c than vHbA1c due to a higher screening test uptake rate among the studied population.

Detailed Description

Aim:

This pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial aims to determine the effectiveness of active opportunistic screening using point-of-care capillary HbA1c (POC-cHbA1c) testing compared to venous HbA1c (vHbA1c) testing in improving T2DM detection among at-risk public primary care patients, to estimate the impact of such a screening strategy in the real-world setting. The ultimate goal would be to fill the current preventive care gap and reduce the burden of undiagnosed T2DM in Hong Kong.

Objectives:

Primary Objectives

  1. To determine the difference in the proportion of T2DM detected between the intervention group (POC-cHbA1c testing) and control group (conventional vHbA1c testing).
  2. To evaluate the uptake rate of the POC-cHbA1c test relative to the vHbA1c test among at-risk public primary care patients in Hong Kong.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Screening
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
45 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Non-diabetic patient;
  • •Aged ≥ 45 years;
  • •Family history of DM in a first-degree relative;
  • •History of Gestational DM;
  • •Hypertension (i.e. Systolic Blood Pressure (BP) ≥140mmHg, Diastolic BP ≥90mmHg or on therapy for hypertension);
  • •History of pre-diabetes (i.e. impaired fasting glucose with fasting glucose concentration between 5.6-6.9 mmol/L, impaired glucose tolerance with 2-hour post challenge plasma glucose concentration between 7.8-11.0 mmol/L or HbA1c between 5.6-6.4%);
  • •Hyperlipidemia (i.e. total cholesterol ≥ 5.2 mmol/L, triglycerides ≥ 1.7 mmol/L or on therapy);
  • •Obesity (i.e. for Chinese subjects, body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m2).

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Known history of T2DM or on hypoglycaemic treatment;
  • •Received T2DM screening within 12-months;
  • •Women who are pregnant or breast-feeding at recruitment;
  • •Active thyroid diseases (including subjects on thyroid replacement therapy or anti-thyroid drugs) or active endocrine diseases such as Cushing's syndrome or Acromegaly at recruitment;
  • •History of blood donation or blood transfusion within 3 months prior to recruitment;
  • •Patients who are taking systemic steroid therapy or iron supplement at recruitment.

Arms & Interventions

Control

No Intervention

Subjects in the control group will be offered a free venous HbA1c test. Consistent with current practice at GOPCs, the venous sampling will be scheduled on a separate clinic visit at a set time within 1-2 weeks of recruitment. Test results will be available within one week. The subject will be informed via phone call regarding his/her DM risk, and if his/her HbA1c≥5.6%, he/she will be scheduled for a confirmatory OGTT within 2-4 weeks, ideally at the same clinic.

Intervention

Experimental

Subjects in the intervention group will be offered a free POC-cHbA1c test to screen for hyperglycemia. The test will be performed on-site (i.e. during the same clinic visit of recruitment). Test results will be available within 10 minutes and the subject will be immediately informed of his/her DM risk, and for those with HbA1c≥5.6%, a confirmatory OGTT will be arranged on-site, scheduled within 2-4 weeks and ideally at the same clinic.

Intervention: POC-cHbA1c testing (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Proportional difference in detection of T2DM

Time Frame: 36 months

The difference in proportion of T2DM detected between the intervention group (POC-cHbA1c testing) and control group (vHbA1c testing)

Uptake rate

Time Frame: 36 months

The uptake rate of POC-cHbA1c testing and vHbA1c testing among consented participants

Secondary Outcomes

  • Proportion of high-risk HbA1c concentration(36 months)
  • Difference in uptake rate of OGTT(36 months)
  • Proportion of patients who refuse to join the study(36 months)
  • Number-needed-to-screen to detect one more T2DM case(36 months)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Dr. Linda Chan

Clinical Assistant Professor

The University of Hong Kong

Study Sites (8)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials