Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04038151
NCT04038151RecruitingNot Applicable

Intuitive Control of a Hybrid Prosthetic Leg During Ambulation

Shirley Ryan AbilityLab1 site in 1 country20 target enrollmentStarted: December 1, 2018Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Recruiting
Enrollment
20
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Average daily number of times subject switches between activities

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The objective of this research is to determine the clinical benefits of an innovative and lightweight powered leg controlled using our intent recognition framework in laboratory and community environments.

Detailed Description

The hypothesis of this study is that using the Hybrid Leg with seamless, automatic transitions will result in participants choosing to become more active and improve their community participation compared to when using their own passive prosthetic leg.

The Hybrid Leg is an an innovative and lightweight powered leg that has 2 operating modes: active and passive. When in active mode, the Hybrid Leg is capable of supplying 120 NM of knee torque and actively repositioning the ankle during non-weight bearing phases of gait. When in passive mode, the motor and transmission are decoupled from the knee, which then behaves like an Ottobock 3R95 passive prosthetic knee, and the non-backdriveable mechanism of the ankle allows it to behave as an energy return foot. Allowing the device to behave passively if the battery becomes depleted or the actuators become damaged is an important enabling safety factor that will allow us to complete our study.

Phase 1: We will enroll 20 subjects a clinical trial of the leg and control system who will be fit with the Hybrid Leg and receive in-lab therapy to learn how to ambulate with the device.

Phase 2: Subjects will be randomized into a clinical trial of the leg and control system with an AB-BA design; condition A - subjects own device; condition B - Hybrid Leg. Subjects will complete an extensive ambulation and community mobility training to learn optimal use of their own passive device or the Hybrid Leg. After training the subjects will complete a full biomechanical analysis for each device as they complete ambulation circuits that include standing, level-ground walking, walking on slopes and on stairs, sit-stand transitions and transitions between these activities.

Phase 3: After completing phase 2 subjects will complete 4-week trials using their assigned prosthesis (Condition A or B) at home and within their community. During the trials subjects will be monitored using mobile phone based sensors and socket mounted activity monitor to determine how often the user performs the ambulation activities.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Crossover
Primary Purpose
Basic Science
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 95 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •A unilateral or bilateral lower limb amputation
  • •K2/K3/K4 ambulator with a prosthesis
  • •English speaking

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Significant new injury that would prevent use of a prosthesis: The ability to consistently wear a prosthesis and perform activities of daily living and specific performance tasks is necessary to evaluate the relative benefits of the interventions.
  • •Cognitive impairment sufficient to adversely affect understanding of or compliance with study requirements, ability to communicate experiences, or ability to give informed consent: The ability to understand and comply with requirements of the study is essential in order for the study to generate useable, reliable data. The ability to obtain relevant user feedback through questionnaires and informal discussion adds significant value to this study.
  • •Significant other comorbidity: Any other medical issues or injuries that would preclude completion of the study, use of the prostheses, or that would otherwise prevent acquisition of useable data by researchers.

Arms & Interventions

Condition A: Hybrid Leg

Experimental

Subject will be trained on use of the experimental device, the Hybrid Leg.

Intervention: Hybrid Leg (Device)

Condition B: Passive Leg

Other

Subject will use their currently prescribed home passive prosthesis

Intervention: Prescribed Passive Prosthesis (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Average daily number of times subject switches between activities

Time Frame: 4 weeks - data collected during 4 week home trial of each device, analyzed upon completion of 4 week home trial

This outcome will be assessed using an accelerometery data measured using a mobile phone during the entire 4-week home trial of each device (Hybrid Leg and prescribed home device), resulting in a pair of outcomes for each subject. Statistical analysis will be done , first using a paired t-test (which assumes no carry-over and no device sequence effects), followed by the analysis using a linear mixed model with device and sequence group as fixed effects, and subject as the random effect. We expect that sequence will not be a statistically significant predictor, but that average transitions will be significantly different between devices, with subjects taking significantly more transitioning between activities more when using the Hybrid Leg.

Average daily number of steps

Time Frame: 4 weeks - data collected during 4 week home trial of each device, analyzed upon completion of 4 week home trial

This outcome will be assessed using an accelerometery data measured using a mobile phone during the entire 4-week home trial of each device (Hybrid Leg and prescribed home device), resulting in a pair of outcomes for each subject. Statistical analysis will be done , first using a paired t-test (which assumes no carry-over and no device sequence effects), followed by the analysis using a linear mixed model with device and sequence group as fixed effects, and subject as the random effect. We expect that sequence will not be a statistically significant predictor, but that average daily steps will be significantly different between devices, with subjects taking significantly more steps when using the Hybrid Leg.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Stair Assessment Index(Lab visit prior to start of home trial and lab visit upon completion of 4 week trial with each device)
  • 5 Times Sit to Stand(Lab visit prior to start of home trial and lab visit upon completion of 4 week trial with each device)
  • GPS tracking analysis(End of each 4 week home trial)
  • Hill Assessment Index(Lab visit prior to start of home trial and lab visit upon completion of 4 week trial with each device)
  • 10 Meter Walk Test(Lab visit prior to start of home trial and lab visit upon completion of 4 week trial with each device)
  • Six-Minute Walk Test(Lab visit prior to start of home trial and lab visit upon completion of 4 week trial with each device)
  • Berg Balance Scale(Lab visit prior to start of home trial and lab visit upon completion of 4 week trial with each device)
  • 4 -Square Step Test(Lab visit prior to start of home trial and lab visit upon completion of 4 week trial with each device)
  • Functional Gait Assessment(Lab visit prior to start of home trial and lab visit upon completion of 4 week trial with each device)
  • Amputee Mobility Predictor(Lab visit prior to start of home trial and lab visit upon completion of 4 week trial with each device)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Levi Hargrove

Director, Regenstein Center for Bionic Medicine

Shirley Ryan AbilityLab

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials