MedPath

The effects of environmental prenatal program on environmental health perception and behavior using internet-based intervention in Korea: a non-randomized controlled study

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Not Applicable
Registration Number
KCT0007086
Lead Sponsor
Hallym University
Brief Summary

As a result of the Shapiro-Wilk normality test of the dependent variable and Levene’s test for the equality of variance test, the p-values were found to satisfy the assumption of the t-test. 1) Primary outcome effects of the IEPP (Internet-Based Environmental Prenatal Program)on environmental health perceptions: Hypothesis 1 was partially supported. The severity score was significantly higher in the IEPP group than in the control group (40.92±3.93 and 45.76±3.47) (t=-4.57, p<.001). The response efficacy score was significantly higher in the IEPP group than in the control group (40.25±5.40 and 45.88±4.42) (t=-3.99 p<.001). In addition, the IEPP had a significantly higher score for benefits than the control group (30.04±4.81 and 32.92±4.04) (t=-2.27, p=.027), and the total score was significantly in the IEPP group than in the control group (236.83±22.80 and 250.68±15.43) (t=-2.49, p=.016). There were no statistically significant differences with regard to susceptibility (43.92±4.74 and 45.92±4.46) (t=-1.52, p=.134), self-efficacy (45.67±8.76 and 47.80±6.72) (t=-0.95, p=.344), and barriers (32.21±4.32 and 32.40±4.88) (t=-0.15, p=.855) between the control and experimental groups. 2) Primary outcome effects of the IEPP on environmental health behaviors: Hypothesis 2 was rejected. There were no statistically significant differences in personal health behaviors (58.79±7.80 and 61.32±8.29) (t=-1.10, p=.278), community health behaviors (58.25±9.26 and 57.00±7.50) (t=0.50, p=.605), or the total score (119.67±13.56 and 118.32±14.10) (t=0.34, p=.735) between the control and experimental groups. 3) Secondary outcome effects of IEPP educational satisfaction: Hypothesis 3 was rejected. There were no statistically significant differences in feasibility (7.71±2.19 and 8.48±1.81) (t=-1.34 p=.185), accessibility (8.42±1.16 and 8.68±1.95) (t=-0.41, p=.677), overall satisfaction (8.42±1.76 and 8.68±1.95) (t=0.51, p=.608), and the total score (24.83±5.21 and 25.56±4.09) (t=-0.50, p=.618) between the control and experimental groups.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
Completed
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
49
Inclusion Criteria

1) pregnant women at over four weeks’ gestation and aged 18 or older, 2) women who wanted to participate in the IEPP, 3) women who participated for the full 4 weeks, and 4) women who had a smart gadget.

Exclusion Criteria

1) pregnant women who were hospitalized for health problems during pregnancy and 2) pregnant women who could not read Korean.

Study & Design

Study Type
Interventional Study
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath