Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/EUCTR2007-000968-25-IT
EUCTR2007-000968-25-IT
Active, not recruiting
Not Applicable

Prospective, blind observer, randomised clinical study to investigate and compare the efficacy of intrathecal plain solutions containing Chloroprocaine 1% (50 mg) versus Bupivacaine 0.5% (10 mg) - ND

SINTETICA ITALIA S.R.L.0 sites120 target enrollmentJune 24, 2008

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
patients undergoing elective short-duration (< 40 min) in low abdominal (gynaecology and urology disciplines) or lower limbs (no more than 1/3 of cases) surgery under spinal anaesthesia.
Sponsor
SINTETICA ITALIA S.R.L.
Enrollment
120
Status
Active, not recruiting
Last Updated
14 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

No summary available.

Registry
who.int
Start Date
June 24, 2008
End Date
TBD
Last Updated
14 years ago
Study Type
Interventional clinical trial of medicinal product
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
SINTETICA ITALIA S.R.L.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Male/female patients scheduled for short duration (less than 40 min) low abdominal or lower limbs (no more than 1/3 of cases) surgery under spinal anaesthesia, 18\-80 years old; 18≤BMI≤32 kg/m2; ASA physical status I\-II; Ability to comprehend the full nature and purpose of the study, including possible risks and side effects; Ability to co\-operate with the Investigator and to comply with the requirements of the entire study; Signed written informed consent prior to inclusion in the study
  • Are the trial subjects under 18? no
  • Number of subjects for this age range:
  • F.1\.2 Adults (18\-64 years) yes
  • F.1\.2\.1 Number of subjects for this age range
  • F.1\.3 Elderly (\>\=65 years) yes
  • F.1\.3\.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion Criteria

  • Clinically relevant abnormalities at ECG (12 leads); Clinically relevant abnormal physical findings and clinically relevant abnormal laboratory values indicative of physical illness/es that in the opinion of the Investigator might interfere with the aim of the study Ascertained or presumptive hypersensitivity to the active principle and/or formulations ingredients Ascertained or presumptive hypersensitivity to the amide type of anaesthetics ASA physical status III, IV or V; Patients requiring further anaesthesia (i.e. gas products); Lactating females; Positive pregnancy test at screening History of neuromuscular diseases to the lower extremities, Contraindication to spinal anaesthesia Participation in the evaluation of any drug within 3 months prior to screening; Blood donations during the 3 months prior to this study; History of drug, or alcohol abuse

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Not specified

Similar Trials

Active, not recruiting
Phase 1
Prospective, blind-observer, randomised clinical study to investigate and compare the efficacy of intrathecal plain solutions containing Chloroprocaine 1% (50 mg) versus Bupivacaine 0.5% (10mg)Patients undergoing elective short duration (<40 min) low abdominal (in gynaecological and urological disciplines) or lower limbs (no more than 1/3 of cases) surgery.MedDRA version: 9.1Level: LLTClassification code 10030858Term: Operation NOS
EUCTR2007-000968-25-DESintetica SA
Completed
Not Applicable
Effectiveness of proteolytic enzymes in controlling the post operative sequelae of surgical third molar disimpactionsHealth Condition 1: null- Partially or completely impacted mandibular third molars which need to be surgically extracted
CTRI/2017/10/010076Dr Chalakuzhy Paul Mathai90
Active, not recruiting
Phase 1
Randomized, single blind, prospective clinical study to compare hFSH-HP (Fostipur) and hMG-HP(Meriofert) in patients with polycystic ovary ander a FIV/ICSI cicle.Women with polycystic ovary under a cicle of FIV/ICSI.Therapeutic area: Body processes [G] - Reproductive physiologi cal processes [G08]
EUCTR2015-005660-42-ESInstitut de Recerca HSCSP164
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Randomized, patient- and observer-blinded evaluation of P6 stimulation for the prevention of nausea and vomiting in the postoperative period in patients receiving routine pharmacological prophylaxis.R11Nausea and vomiting
DRKS00015272Klinik für Anästhesie und Intensivtherapie, Philipps-Universität Marburg3,500
Completed
Not Applicable
Study comparing localised hand psoralen immersion combined with ultraviolet A (PUVA) with localised hand narrowband ultraviolet B (UVB) for the treatment of hand eczema
ISRCTN18213910ewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (UK)76