MedPath

A Prospective, Single-Arm Multi-Center Study of the ENSEAL X1 Curved Jaw Tissue Sealer in Select Procedures

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Upper GI; Lower GI; Gynecological
Interventions
Device: ENSEAL X1 Curved Jaw
Registration Number
NCT04763421
Lead Sponsor
Ethicon Endo-Surgery
Brief Summary

This prospective, single-arm, multi-center study will collect clinical data in a post-market setting by procedure group (upper gastrointestinal \[GI\], lower GI, and gynecological). Investigators will perform each procedure using the device in compliance with their standard surgical approach and the ENSEAL X1 Curved Jaw and Generator G11 instructions for use.

Detailed Description

The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate the acceptable performance and safety of the ENSEAL X1 Curved Jaw and Generator G11 devices when used per the instructions for use.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
145
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Primary laparoscopic or open procedure (upper gastrointestinal, lower gastrointestinal, or gynecological) where at least one vessel is planned to be transected by the ENSEAL X1 Curved Jaw device per the instructions for use;
  2. Willingness to give consent and comply with all study-related evaluations and visit schedule; and
  3. At least 18 years of age.
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Physical or psychological condition which would impair study participation; or
  2. Enrollment in a concurrent interventional clinical study that could impact the study endpoints.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Upper Gastrointestinal/Lower Gastrointestinal/GynecologicalENSEAL X1 Curved JawAny upper gastrointestinal/lower gastrointestinal/gynecological procedure where the ENSEAL X1 Curved Jaw is used for vessel transection according to instructions for use.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number of Vessels With Less Than or Equal to (<=) Grade 3 Hemostasis Based on Hemostasis Grading ScaleOn the day of transection (Day 0)

Number of vessels with \<= Grade 3 hemostasis based on hemostasis grading scale were reported. A 4-point grading scale was used to assess hemostasis in blood vessels. Grade 1: no bleeding at transection site; Grade 2: minor bleeding at transection site, no intervention needed; Grade 3: minor bleeding at transection site, mild intervention needed, use of compression, monopolar device and/or touch-ups with ENSEAL X1; or Grade 4: significant bleeding (example, pulsatile blood flow, venous pooling) requiring intervention such as extensive coagulation or use of additional hemostatic measures (example, hemoclips, staples, sutures, fibrin sealants, other advanced energy products).

Number of Participants With Device-related Adverse Events (AEs)From Day 0 up to post-procedure follow up visit (up to 28 days)

Number of participants with device-related AEs were reported. Device-related AEs were those AEs identified as having a relationship of possibly, probably, or causally with the study devices.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number of Participants With Adhesion Removal or Division Using ENSEAL X1 Device as Assessed by Surgeon Satisfaction Scale ScoreOn the day of transection (Day 0)

Number of participants with adhesion removal or division using ENSEAL X1 device as assessed by Surgeon Satisfaction scale score were reported. Surgeon satisfaction scale score is a 5-point scale (very dissatisfied, dissatisfied, neither satisfied or dissatisfied, satisfied, or very satisfied) where surgeon rated the use of the device for adhesion removal or division by ENSEAL X1.

Number of Participants With Lymphatics Bundles Division Using ENSEAL X1 Device as Assessed by Surgeon Satisfaction Scale ScoreOn the day of transection (Day 0)

Number of participants with lymphatics bundles division using ENSEAL X1 device as assessed by Surgeon Satisfaction scale score were reported. Surgeon satisfaction scale score is a 5-point scale (very dissatisfied, dissatisfied, neither satisfied or dissatisfied, satisfied, or very satisfied) where surgeon rated the use of the device for lymphatic bundles by ENSEAL X1.

Number of Participants With Tissues Bundles Division Using ENSEAL X1 Device as Assessed by Surgeon Satisfaction Scale ScoreOn the day of transection (Day 0)

Number of participants with tissues bundles division using ENSEAL X1 device as assessed by Surgeon Satisfaction scale score were reported. Surgeon satisfaction scale score is a 5-point scale (very dissatisfied, dissatisfied, neither satisfied or dissatisfied, satisfied, or very satisfied) where surgeon rated the use of the device for tissues bundles by ENSEAL X1.

Number of Participants With Tissues Grasping Using ENSEAL X1 Device as Assessed by Surgeon Satisfaction Scale ScoreOn the day of transection (Day 0)

Number of participants with tissues grasping using ENSEAL X1 device as assessed by Surgeon Satisfaction scale score were reported. Surgeon satisfaction scale score is a 5-point scale (very dissatisfied, dissatisfied, neither satisfied or dissatisfied, satisfied, or very satisfied) where surgeon rated the use of the device for tissues grasping by ENSEAL X1.

Number of Participants With Tissues Cutting Using ENSEAL X1 Device as Assessed by Surgeon Satisfaction Scale ScoreOn the day of transection (Day 0)

Number of participants with tissues cutting using ENSEAL X1 device as assessed by Surgeon Satisfaction scale score were reported. Surgeon satisfaction scale score is a 5-point scale (very dissatisfied, dissatisfied, neither satisfied or dissatisfied, satisfied, or very satisfied) where surgeon rated the use of the device for tissues cutting by ENSEAL X1.

Number of Participants With Tissues Dissection Using ENSEAL X1 Device as Assessed by Surgeon Satisfaction Scale ScoreOn the day of transection (Day 0)

Number of participants with tissues dissection using ENSEAL X1 device as assessed by Surgeon Satisfaction scale score were reported. Surgeon satisfaction scale score is a 5-point scale (very dissatisfied, dissatisfied, neither satisfied or dissatisfied, satisfied, or very satisfied) where surgeon rated the use of the device for tissues dissection by ENSEAL X1.

Number of Vessels With Hemostasis (Grade 1 to 4) Based on Hemostasis Grading ScaleOn the day of transection (Day 0)

Number of vessels with hemostasis (Grade 1 to 4) based on hemostasis grading scale were reported. A 4-point grading scale was used to assess hemostasis in blood vessels. Grade 1: no bleeding at transection site; Grade 2: minor bleeding at transection site, no intervention needed; Grade 3: minor bleeding at transection site, mild intervention needed, use of compression, monopolar device and/or touch-ups with ENSEAL X1; or Grade 4: significant bleeding (example, pulsatile blood flow, venous pooling) requiring intervention such as extensive coagulation or use of additional hemostatic measures (example, hemoclips, staples, sutures, fibrin sealants, other advanced energy products).

Percentage of Grade 4 Vessel Transections Requiring Hemostasis MeasuresOn the day of transection (Day 0)

Percentage of Grade 4 vessel transections requiring hemostasis measures were planned to be reported. Data was not collected and analyzed for this outcome measure because there were no hemostatic grade 4 vessel transections.

Trial Locations

Locations (6)

Southmead Hospital

🇬🇧

Bristol, United Kingdom

Atrium Health

🇺🇸

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Gemelli Hospital

🇮🇹

Rome, Italy

Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh

🇬🇧

Edinburgh, United Kingdom

Yeovil District Hospital

🇬🇧

Yeovil, United Kingdom

Western General Hospital

🇬🇧

Edinburgh, United Kingdom

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath