EUCTR2005-001297-27-GB
Active, not recruiting
Phase 1
Comparative Efficacy & Safety of Two Intranasal Fluticasone Propionate Formulations in Persistent Allergic Rhinitis - N/A
eolab td0 sites22 target enrollmentApril 5, 2005
ConditionsPersistent allergic rhinitis
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Persistent allergic rhinitis
- Sponsor
- eolab td
- Enrollment
- 22
- Status
- Active, not recruiting
- Last Updated
- 6 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •1\. Written informed consent.
- •2\. Male or female between 18 and 70 years of age inclusive.
- •3\. Diagnosis of persistent allergic rhinitis.
- •4\. Skin\-prick positive to at least one common aeroallergen.
- •5\. Score on miniRQLQ of \=1 following a 2 week run\-in period.
- •6\. Willing to use effective contraceptive measures such as oral contraceptive or intra\-uterine device (IUD) (women of childbearing potential only).
- •7\. In the opinion of the investigator, able to comply with the requirements of the protocol.
- •Are the trial subjects under 18? no
- •Number of subjects for this age range:
- •F.1\.2 Adults (18\-64 years) yes
Exclusion Criteria
- •1\. Known or suspected hypersensitivity to fluticasone propionate or any other constituents of the Investigational Medicinal product (IMP).
- •2\. Any clinically significant medical condition or abnormality, which, in the opinion of the investigator, might compromise the safety of the subject or which might interfere with the study.
- •3\. Nasal polyposis (Grade 2\+) or significant (\=50%) septal deviation.
- •4\. Asthmatic patients receiving doses of inhaled corticosteroids greater than 800µg beclometasone dipropionate or equivalent unless their dose has been stable for at least 28 days
- •5\. Females who are pregnant, lactating or planning to become pregnant.
- •6\. Clinically significant laboratory test results, as judged by the investigator.
- •7\. Patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis classified as severe according to the ARIA Guidelines, in addition to a positive skin prick test to grass pollen.
- •8\. Patients previously enrolled into this study, except those screened and excluded on the grounds of inclusion criteria number 5 prior to amendment 4 (protocol v2\), and those that declined randomisation due to visit timing difficulties prior to the same amendment.
- •9\. Receipt of an investigational drug within 30 days or 5 half\-lives, whichever is longer, prior to screening, except where related to previous screening (i.e. placebo run\-in) for this study prior to amendment 4 (protocol v2\).
- •10\. Patients who are scheduled to receive any other investigational drug during the course of the study.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified
Similar Trials
Active, not recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparative efficacy and safety of two intranasal Triamcinolone Acetonide formulations in persistent allergic rhinitisPersistent allergic rhinitisEUCTR2005-002742-19-GBeolab Limited24
Not yet recruiting
Phase 2
Effect of midazolam through nasal versus intravenous route in controlling seizures in children.Health Condition 1: G969- Disorder of central nervous system, unspecifiedCTRI/2024/01/061644Government medical college and hospital, Chandigarh
Recruiting
Phase 2
Effect of budesonide, montelukast and their combination in allergic rhinitisAllergic rhinitis.Vasomotor and allergic rhinitisIRCT20171030037093N41Esfahan University of Medical Sciences135
Recruiting
Phase 4
A clinical trial to study the effects of four combinations of drugs for Procedural Sedation and Analgesia in Paediatric dental patients.Health Condition 1: K00-K14- Diseases of oral cavity and salivary glandsCTRI/2021/02/030932Dr Agarwal Abhilasha Kishanlal
Completed
Phase 2
Comparison of intranasal midazolam and ketamine in peripheral IV access in childrePain and distress associated with peripheral IV access in children in emergency department.IRCT20200728048242N1Iran University of Medical Sciences100