跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04238793
NCT04238793已完成1 期

A Phase 1/2a, First-in-Human, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Therapeutic Activity of Single Ascending Doses of KLS-2031 Administered by Transforaminal Epidural Injection in Patients With Neuropathic Pain From Lumbosacral Radiculopathy

Kolon Life Science1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 18 人开始时间: 2020年4月16日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
1 期
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
18
试验地点
1
主要终点
The safety and tolerability of KLS-2031

研究概览

简要总结

Escalating single-dose design study to determine the safety, tolerability, and analgesic activity of KLS-2031

详细描述

This is a first-in-human (FIH), multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, escalating single-dose design study to determine the safety, tolerability, and analgesic activity of KLS-2031 administered by transforaminal epidural injection to subjects aged 18 to 75 years with neuropathic pain due to LSR.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 75 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • To participate in the study, subjects must have met the following criteria at Visit 1 (Screening,
  • Day -56 to Day -15):
  • The subject signed a written informed consent for study participation including the 1-year double-blind treatment period and 1-year, open-label, long-term extension period.
  • Informed consent must have been obtained before any screening activities are conducted.
  • The subject, male or female, must have been between the ages of 18 and 75 years, inclusive.
  • The subject must have had a body mass index of ≤35 kg/m².
  • The subject must have had a diagnosis of pain due to LSR, with all of the following characteristics:
  • The subject perceived pain in 1 or both lower limbs at areas that are consistent with the area innervated by the lumbar 4 or 5 or sacral 1 (L4, L5, S1) nerve roots, with or without other sensory symptoms in the affected areas (typically, the pain may have been perceived in the buttock, thigh, calf, leg, foot, or toes). If both limbs were affected, pain had to be asymmetrical (ie, pain worse in 1 limb).
  • Pain in the leg radiated to below the knee.
  • Pain in the leg was worse during rest and/or at night and not solely present upon walking.
  • The history of the pain suggested that the cause of the LSR was due to the injury of the lumbosacral nerve root(s) by degenerative disease of the vertebrae in the lumbosacral spine or associated soft tissues (including the intervertebral discs).
  • The duration of the pain since onset was ≥6 months.
  • Based on clinical history, the intensity of the neuropathic (leg) pain had been stable during the 4-week period before screening (the pain may have fluctuated and may have been worse at night or at rest but was present on most days of the week).
  • Pain in the leg (worse affected leg) was worse than pain in the back.

排除标准

  • Subjects were excluded from the study if 1 or more of the following criteria were applicable:
  • The subject had:
  • Neuropathic pain due to causes other than that specified in the inclusion criteria (eg, postherpetic neuralgia; painful diabetic neuropathy; mononeuritis multiplex; central poststroke pain; spinal abscess, infection, hematoma, spondylolisthesis with displacement, or malignancy; phantom limb pain; peripheral neuropathy due to alcoholism, malignancy, HIV, syphilis; drug abuse; vitamin B12 deficiency; hypothyroidism; liver disease; toxic exposure).
  • Radicular pain at more than 1 spinal level, unstable spine, spondylolisthesis (>Grade 1), spondylolysis, caudal equina syndrome, arachnoiditis, progressive neurological deficit, moderate to severe central spinal canal stenosis (congenital or acquired) from other origins, vertebral compression fracture(s).
  • Pain that was associated with a substantial somatic pain component in lower limbs or other parts of the body apart from the back (eg, non-neuropathic/musculoskeletal pain) or more than 1 cause or potential cause for pain symptoms in low limbs.
  • Any painful concurrent rheumatic disease such as, but not limited to, fibromyalgia, rheumatoid arthritis, or osteoarthritis that in the investigator's opinion would have prevented the subject from reliably delineating or assessing his/her pain due to LSR. Note: Any question regarding the acceptability of the etiology of the neuropathic pain was to be discussed with the medical monitor.
  • Had lumbar stenosis with pain present solely upon walking. Presence of lumbar narrowing on MRI was acceptable if the pain was not solely present upon walking.
  • In the investigator's opinion, the subject was unable to reliably delineate or assess his/her own pain by anatomical location/distribution (eg, the subject could not reliably tell the difference between his/her back pain and lower limb pain and could not rate the intensity of each separately).
  • The subject had pain in the lower limbs solely upon walking and not at rest.

研究组 & 干预措施

Cohort 2

Experimental

Dose 2 (medium dose: 1×1012 VG/500 μL solution) or Placebo

干预措施: KLS-2031 (Drug)

Cohort 1

Experimental

Dose 1 (low dose: 1×1011 VG/500 μL solution) or Placebo

干预措施: KLS-2031 (Drug)

Cohort 1

Experimental

Dose 1 (low dose: 1×1011 VG/500 μL solution) or Placebo

干预措施: Placebo (Other)

Cohort 2

Experimental

Dose 2 (medium dose: 1×1012 VG/500 μL solution) or Placebo

干预措施: Placebo (Other)

Cohort 3

Experimental

Dose 3 (high dose: 1×1013 VG/500 μL solution) or Placebo

干预措施: KLS-2031 (Drug)

Cohort 3

Experimental

Dose 3 (high dose: 1×1013 VG/500 μL solution) or Placebo

干预措施: Placebo (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

The safety and tolerability of KLS-2031

时间窗: Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 12, Week 26, Week 52

Frequency and nature of AEs, laboratory test results, vital sign measurements, physical and complete neurological examinations, and 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs)

次要结局

  • Long-term safety and tolerability of KLS-2031(Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 12, Week 26, Week 52, Week 78, Week 104)
  • Time (number of weeks) to ≥30% and ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in the average daily pain score (PI-NRS)(Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 12, Week 26, Week 52, Week 104)
  • Amount of rescue medication used (in terms of dosage/day)(Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 12, Week 26, Week 52)
  • Time to treatment failure(Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 12, Week 26, Week 52)
  • Change from baseline in weekly mean of the average daily pain score(Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 12, Week 26, Week 52, Week 104)
  • Change from baseline in the modified Modified Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) scores (back pain and leg pain)(Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 12, Week 26, Week 52, Week 104)
  • Local safety and tolerability (including AEs, clinical laboratory parameters, and physical examination) of administration by transforaminal epidural injectionepidural injection as measured by the occurrence of injection site reactions(Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 12, Week 26, Week 52)
  • Change from baseline in Galer Neuropathic Pain Scale (Galer NPS)(Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 12, Week 26, Week 52, Week 104)
  • Change from baseline in the Simple Profile of Moods States (POMS) - 2 Short Form total score and domain scores(Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 12, Week 26, Week 52, Week 104)
  • Assessment of suicidality(Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 12, Week 26, Week 52)
  • Number and percentage of subjects who have ≥30% and ≥50% reduction from baseline in the average daily pain score (PI-NRS)(Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 12, Week 26, Week 52, Week 104)
  • Number and percentage of subjects who are much improved or very much improved from baseline(Week 12, Week 26, Week 52, Week 104)
  • Change from baseline in Daily Sleep Interference Scale (DSIS) score(Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 12, Week 26, Week 52, Week 104)
  • Change from baseline in the Short Form-36 v2 (SF-36v2) score(Week 12, Week 26, Week 52, Week 104)

研究者

发起方
Kolon Life Science
申办方类型
Industry
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验