Comparison of two surgical techniques (osseodensification versus lateral window) for maxillary sinus augmentatio
- Conditions
- Reduced bone height in the posterior maxilla (1-4 mm)Oral Health
- Registration Number
- ISRCTN35171361
- Lead Sponsor
- Egas Moniz Cooperativa de Ensino Superior - CR
- Brief Summary
2023 Results article in https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38018261/ (added 05/12/2023)
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 20
1. Adults aged 22 or older
2. Systemically healthy, without active periodontal disease (gingivitis or periodontitis) or peri-implant disease (mucositis or periimplantitis) in implants already present
3. Non-smokers
4. Absence of tooth in the posterior maxillary and reduced bone height (1-4 mm of residual bone), with the need for maxillary sinus elevation for implant rehabilitation
5. Minimum crestal bone width of 6 mm
6. No temporomandibular dysfunction
7. Remaining teeth in sound condition
8. Appropriate interocclusal space for implant rehabilitation
1. Pregnancy
2. Smokers
3. History of alcoholism or drug abuse during the past 5 years
4. Hypertension or uncontrolled diabetes
5. Pathology of the maxillary sinus
6. Temporomandibular pathology
7. Patients with malignant tumors
8. Patients taking steroids daily or taking bisphosphonates
9. Patients with a history of chemotherapy or radiation therapy in the last 24 months
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method