Virtual Reality for Patient Informed Consent in Neurosurgery
- Conditions
- VR-based Informed Consent
- Interventions
- Other: VR-based patient informed consent
- Registration Number
- NCT06627426
- Lead Sponsor
- University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
- Brief Summary
The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to evaluate benefits of VR (virtual reality)-based patient informed consent in neurosurgery regarding subjective patient comprehension, patient-doctor relationship and anxiety.
- Detailed Description
Additionally, the investigators aim to assess the cost-benefit radio as well as feasibility in a clinical routine setting. Considering the increasing patient participation in decision-making, VR could lead to better understanding of complex surgical procedures, improving the perioperative process for both, patient and surgeon, and reduce anxiety.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- NOT_YET_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 34
- Patients between the age of 18 and 75
- Surgical clipping for intracranial aneurysm, resection of vascular malformations
- Craniotomy and Resection of intracranial tumors that can be segmented for VR
- Visual or auditory impairment with no sufficient aid
- Patient that had VR informed consent for surgery before
- Psychiatric illness, cognitive impairment
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description VR-based patient informed consent VR-based patient informed consent The "intervention" group will be the on receiving VR-based patient informed consent. One surgeon from the study team will be guiding the patient through their VR model and enable them to use the VR system by themselves.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Comparison of intensity of anxiety between intervention and control group one time assessment at day 1 Comparison of intensity of physical and cognitive anxiety symptoms will be assessed by the questionnaire Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). This questionnaire consists of 21 self-reported items (four-point scale).
min score: 39 (minimal anxiety level) max score:174 (severe anxiety)Comparison of patient doctor relationship between intervention and control group one time assessment at day 1 Comparison of patient doctor relationship will be assessed by PDRQ9 (patient-doctor relationship questionnaire). The questionnaire is a 9-item scale that assesses patients' perception of the relationship with the physician. Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 'not at all appropriate' to 'totally appropriate'. Raw sum scores range from 9 to 45, with higher scores indicating that the patient's perception of the patient-doctor relationship is more favorable.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University Hospital Basel
🇨ðŸ‡Basel, Switzerland