MedPath

Virtual Reality for Patient Informed Consent in Neurosurgery

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
VR-based Informed Consent
Registration Number
NCT06627426
Lead Sponsor
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Brief Summary

The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to evaluate benefits of VR (virtual reality)-based patient informed consent in neurosurgery regarding subjective patient comprehension, patient-doctor relationship and anxiety.

Detailed Description

Additionally, the investigators aim to assess the cost-benefit radio as well as feasibility in a clinical routine setting. Considering the increasing patient participation in decision-making, VR could lead to better understanding of complex surgical procedures, improving the perioperative process for both, patient and surgeon, and reduce anxiety.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
34
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients between the age of 18 and 75
  • Surgical clipping for intracranial aneurysm, resection of vascular malformations
  • Craniotomy and Resection of intracranial tumors that can be segmented for VR
Exclusion Criteria
  • Visual or auditory impairment with no sufficient aid
  • Patient that had VR informed consent for surgery before
  • Psychiatric illness, cognitive impairment

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Comparison of intensity of anxiety between intervention and control groupone time assessment at day 1

Comparison of intensity of physical and cognitive anxiety symptoms will be assessed by the questionnaire Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). This questionnaire consists of 21 self-reported items (four-point scale).

min score: 39 (minimal anxiety level) max score:174 (severe anxiety)

Comparison of patient doctor relationship between intervention and control groupone time assessment at day 1

Comparison of patient doctor relationship will be assessed by PDRQ9 (patient-doctor relationship questionnaire). The questionnaire is a 9-item scale that assesses patients' perception of the relationship with the physician. Items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 'not at all appropriate' to 'totally appropriate'. Raw sum scores range from 9 to 45, with higher scores indicating that the patient's perception of the patient-doctor relationship is more favorable.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University Hospital Basel

🇨🇭

Basel, Switzerland

University Hospital Basel
🇨🇭Basel, Switzerland
Emilia Westarp, Dr. med.
Contact
+41 61 32 87187
emilia.westarp@usb.ch
Raphael Guzman, Prof. Dr.
Contact
+41 61 32 87522
raphael.guzman@usb.ch

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.