Proactive patient-centred treatment planning with chronically sick older patients
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health and everyday life problems as assessed by the STEP-assessmentother volunteered health problems
- Registration Number
- DRKS00000792
- Lead Sponsor
- Institut für AllgemeinmedizinMedizinische Hochschule Hannover
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Complete
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 332
Inclusion Criteria
having been to the GP's office
Exclusion Criteria
nursing status II,III, dementia, no ability to understand or speak German, legal incapacity, no telephone
Study & Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Agreement (Cohen's Kappa) of the importance ratings for the health problems between each patient and his doctor. The importance ratings for the health problems per patient is determined two weeks after the doctor-patient-consultation. A significant difference of the Kappas between intervention- and control patients will be ascertained with a t-test. Additionally, in a multilevel regression modell the influence of group affiliation (intervention or controll) on the agreement of the importance ratings will be tested.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The secondary outcomes relate to the patients. Questions are administered two days and two weeks after the doctor-patient consultation. A sum score will be calculated for the responses related to each outcome: satisfaction with visit to doctor (ZAP-subscale) and satisfaction with doctor's information, shared decision making (readiness and experienced), doctor-patient-relationship, empowerment (questions composed of API, Man-Song-Hing and own). Significance tests will determine differences between intervention- and controlgroup.