Transabdominal Versus Transvaginal Ultrasound to Assess the Thickness of the Lower Uterine Segment at Term in Women With Previous One Cesarean Section.
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 130
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- accuracy test for measuring
研究概览
简要总结
aims to determine the accuracy of measurement of the LUS thickness by trans-abdominal and transvaginal ultrasound at term pregnancy in comparison to the actual thickness of LUS measured with manual caliper measurement during cesarean delivery.
Study hypothesis: In women with previous cesarean delivery, determination of the LUS thickness can be done by trans-abdominal and transvaginal ultrasound at term pregnancy and compared to the actual thickness of LUS measured with a manual caliper at cesarean delivery.
Study question: considering transabdominal & transvaginal ultrasound, which of them would be more accurate in the assessment of LUS thickness?
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Case Only
- 时间视角
- Cross Sectional
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 20 Years 至 40 Years（Adult）
- 性别
- Female
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Age (20:40 years old).
- •Women at term (37:40 weeks).
- •With singleton pregnancy.
- •Presenting by vertex (cephalic presentation).
- •Having adequate liquor.
- •Previous delivered by cesarean delivery one time.
排除标准
- •Fetal malformations, e.g fetal hydrops.
- •Uterine malformations, e.g bicornuate uterus.
- •Placental malformations, e.g placenta praevia, placenta accrete.
- •Uterine surgery is other than a cesarean, e.g myomectomy.
- •Women in labor (painful, regular uterine contractions, cervical dilatation, tender scar, and discomfort is not stopped by sedation).
- •Obese patients (BMI >30 kg/m2)
结局指标
主要结局
accuracy test for measuring
时间窗: 1 week
The accuracy of measurement of the LUS thickness by trans-abdominal and transvaginal ultrasound at term pregnancy in comparison to actual thickness of LUS measured with manual caliper at cesarean delivery.
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
ahmed nagy shaker ramadan
Principal Investigator
Cairo University