Inter-rater and Intra-rater Reliability Study of the Global Eyelash Assessment Scale for Assessment of Overall Eyelash Prominence
- Conditions
- Healthy Volunteers
- Registration Number
- NCT01252147
- Lead Sponsor
- Allergan
- Brief Summary
This study will evaluate the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of the Global Eyelash Assessment (GEA) scale with photonumeric guide in Japanese subjects.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 68
- Able and willing to remove all eye makeup and facial jewelry during study
- Permanent eyelid makeup or eyelash implants of any kind
- Eyelash tint or dye application within 2 months
- Eyelash extensions within 3 months
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Overall Inter-Rater Reliability of Assessing Overall Eyelash Prominence Using the Japanese Global Eyelash Assessment Scale (GEA-J) at Day 1 Day 1 Inter-rater agreement (among raters) of the GEA-J scores (1=minimum,2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked) to assess eyelash prominence was evaluated using Kendall's coefficient of concordance (Kendall's W). Each of 7 raters who scored 68 subjects' eyelashes using GEA-J Scale with photonumeric guide at 2 different time points at day 1. The overall inter-rater agreement for Kendall's W for all raters combined was estimated based on the average of the scores from those 2 different time points. The degree of agreement of the point estimates of Kendall's W was interpreted according to the reference range scale that was pre-defined as: \<=0: poor, 0.00-0.20: slightly, 0.21-0.40: fair, 0.41-0.60: moderate, 0.61-0.80: substantial, 0.81-1:00: almost perfect. The 95% confidence interval for Kendall's W is provided.
Overall Intra-Rater Reliability of Assessing Overall Eyelash Prominence Using the Japanese Global Eyelash Assessment Scale (GEA-J) at Day 1 Day 1 Intra-rater (within raters) agreement of the GEA-J scores (1=minimum, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked) to assess eyelash prominence was evaluated by weighted Kappa statistics. Weighted Kappa statistics were calculated for each of 7 rater who evaluated 68 subjects using GEA-J scale with photonumeric guide, assessing agreement between 2 different time points at day 1. The overall intra-rater agreement for Kappa statistics for all raters combined was estimated by pooling Kappa statistics for each rater using a chi-square statistic. The degree of agreement of the point estimates of Kappa statistics was interpreted according to the reference range scale that was pre-defined as: \<=0: poor, 0.00-0.20: slightly, 0.21-0.40: fair, 0.41-0.60: moderate, 0.61-0.80: substantial, 0.81-1:00: almost perfect. The 95% confidence interval for Kappa statistics is provided.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method