Clinical Evaluation of Dental Restorations in Composite Resin made 14 years ago

Not Applicable

• Conditions: Dental Restoration Wear; Tooth Wear; Dental Caries Susceptibility; E06.780.346.737.125; C07.793.818; G10.549.140

• Registration Number: RBR-8gcd45
• Lead Sponsor: Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco

Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Results First Posted: 1900-01-01
• Study Start: 2018-02-07
• Last Update Posted: 29 May 2023

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: Data analysis completed
• Sex: Not specified
• Target Recruitment: Not specified

Inclusion Criteria

Patients with indication of restoration in at least 3 posterior teeth; good oral hygiene condition; healthy or properly restored antagonistic teeth.

Exclusion Criteria

Have made any changes in the restorations, replacements, repairs, prostheses; loss of dental elements analyzed in the study.

Study & Design

• Study Type: Observational
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Expected Outcome 1: Satisfactory clinical performance of the restorations, after 14 years, verified using the USPHS (United State Public Healt Service) method, based on the observation of a variation of at least 5% in pre and post-intervention measurements, comparing 14-year clinical assessment compared to baseline.;Conclusion Found 1: It was observed that all the analyzed materials obtained a good clinical performance after 14 years. As for color reproducibility: score A (ideal) = 23.8%, B (acceptable) = 42.8%, C (unsatisfactory) = 28.57% and D (unsatisfactory) = 4.7%; discoloration of the superficial cavity margin: A score = 61.9%, B = 38.1%; caries recurrence: score A = 100%; wear and marginal integrity: score A = 9.5%, B = 80.9%, C = 9.5%.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Expected outcome 2: There would be statistically significant differences between the resins tested in the analyzed questions (color reproduction, marginal integrity, superficial cavo margin discoloration and loss of substance). From the observation of variation of the evaluations by at least 5%.;Conclusion 2: There were no statistically significant differences between the materials tested in this study (p> 0.281).<br>- Color Playback: Filtek P60 (1 Alpha, 3 Bravo, 3 Charlie); Surefil (3 Alpha, 2 Bravo, 2 Charlie); Suprafill (1 Alpha, 4 Bravo, 1 Charlie, 1 Delta) = p = 0.958.<br>- Discoloration of the Cavo Superficial Margin: Filtek P60 (3 Alpha, 4 Bravo); Surefil (5 Alpha, 2 Bravo; Suprafill (5 Alpha, 2 Bravo) = p = 0.281.<br>- Presence of Caries: Filtek P60 (7 Alpha); Surefil (7 Alfa); Suprafill (7 Alfa) = p = 1.00.<br>- Contour or Loss of Substance: Filtek P60 (6 Bravo, 1 Charlie); Surefil (7 Bravo); Suprafill (1 Alpha, 5 Bravo, 1 Charlie) = p = 0.746.