跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03396536
NCT03396536已完成不适用

The Impact of Peri-implant Soft Tissue Properties on Patient-reported and Clinically Assessed Outcomes: A Prospective Study

Tufts University0 个研究点目标入组 43 人开始时间: 2014年1月15日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
43
主要终点
Patient Discomfort

研究概览

简要总结

The objective of this study is to evaluate patient discomfort while performing oral hygiene (OH) around implants with and without keratinized mucosa (KM) and assess peri-implant soft tissue esthetic satisfaction and other clinical parameters at the 3- and 6-month follow-up visits. Group 1 will be implants with KM and Group 2 implants without KM. The hypotheses underlying this proposal are (1) that dental implants surrounded by KM will have better patient-reported outcomes regarding discomfort during brushing compared with those that lack KM; (2) that dental implants with KM will show more favorable clinical outcomes (plaque index, bleeding on probing, pocket depth and peri-implant recession) compared with those without KM and (3) that dental implants with KM will have higher patient peri-implant tissue esthetic satisfaction compared with those without KM.

详细描述

In the oral cavity, the soft tissue of the alveolar ridge can be classified as keratinized mucosa (KM) or alveolar mucosa (AM). Typically KM forms a cuff around an implant, while AM is farther away and covers the alveolar ridge, as well the lips, the inside of the cheeks, the floor of the mouth under the tongue. KM is pink in color and has a keratinized epithelium. AM is red and has a non-keratinized epithelium. Due to anatomical or surgical reasons KM on the buccal site might be missing. Therefore implants without KM have AM directly around their collar. The two groups in the research will be defined according to the presence or absence of KM. Group 1 will be implants with KM and Group 2 implants without KM. In Group 2 AM will be directly present around the implant.

Although specific situations recommend a minimal width of 2 mm of keratinized tissue around teeth to prevent gingival inflammation, the influence of keratinized tissue on peri-implant clinical and patient-reported outcomes still needs to be investigated. Many authors have stated that that the presence of peri-implant keratinized mucosa is a prerequisite for the maintenance of soft tissue health and have advocated for soft tissue augmentation procedures around implants. Nevertheless, since other authors failed to demonstrate a significant association between clinical inflammatory parameters and the quality of peri-implant mucosa, soft tissue augmentation procedures are not recommended, unless the patient reports pain and discomfort while brushing around an implant without KM or unless there are esthetic concerns. Those recommendations are however not evidence-based. To the best of our knowledge no prospective studies have been conducted to evaluate systematically discomfort during brushing at implant sites and patient soft tissue esthetic assessment, with special emphasis on the quality of peri-implant soft tissue.

Dental implants can be placed according to a one-stage or a two-stage protocol. For two-stage implant surgery, as is required for this study, there are the following steps (stages).

  1. Implant placement surgery occurs. At this time, the implant is placed in the bone. A cover screw is placed on top of the implant and then covered with mucosa (gums).
  2. After a period of a few months to allow for healing, the mucosa (gums) on top of the implant is opened making a small incision. The cover screw is removed. Then, an additional implant piece called a healing abutment is placed that penetrates through the gums. This healing abutment allows for soft tissues to heal around the implant abutment before an impression is made for the manufacture of the implant crown.

Additional steps are then required for placement of the implant crown (artificial tooth). For this study, the baseline visit will be at the time of step 2. The implant will already have been placed previously and the patient will be returning to the clinic for their scheduled second stage surgery.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Case Control
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients 18 years of age or older
  • Patients treatment planned for second stage implant surgery (having already had stage one completed
  • Partially or fully edentulous patients that have a single implant or have multiple implants that are non-adjacent
  • Patients that have implant(s) that will be restored with fixed cement- or screw-retained restoration(s)

排除标准

  • Unwilling to sign informed consent form
  • Non-English speaking subjects
  • Pregnant women (self-reported)
  • Heavy smokers (10 cigarettes/day)
  • Known allergy to iodine and/or potassium iodide (ingredients of Lugol's solution)

结局指标

主要结局

Patient Discomfort

时间窗: Change in patient discomfort at 6 months

This will be a prospective clinical study to evaluate patient discomfort while performing oral hygiene (OH) around implants with and without KM and assess peri-implant soft tissue esthetic evaluation and other clinical parameters at the 3- and 6-month follow-up visits. The primary outcome will be discomfort during brushing at implant site.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

相似试验