Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03977324
NCT03977324
Unknown
Not Applicable

Surgical Protocol for Peri-implantitis in Horizontal Defect in Absence of Keratinised Tissue Using Chemical Decontamination With Chlorhexidine and a CTG: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele1 site in 1 country30 target enrollmentJuly 2, 2018

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Peri-Implantitis
Sponsor
Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele
Enrollment
30
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Bleeding on probing changes
Last Updated
5 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Peri-implant diseases are common post-restorative complications in implant rehabilitations and they occur with an incidence of 12-43%. Based on the available data in literature, the surgical therapy for peri-implantitis is effective in disease resolution. Surgical access to peri-implant lesions facilitates the removal of all granulation tissue from the defect area as well as debridement and decontamination of the exposed implant surface defect area. Different techniques have been used for implant surface decontamination during peri-implant surgery, including mechanical, chemical and laser treatments.

Detailed Description

Peri-implantitis are defined as inflammatory diseases caused by bacterial biofilm around implant surface characterized by bleeding on probing, probing depth and eventually bone loss; if not successfully treated they may lead to implant loss. Based on the available parameters that have been reported in literature non surgical therapy doesn't seem to be effective on peri-implantitis. Therefore it is recommended to consider advanced therapies such as surgical interventions when non surgical peri-implant therapy fails to achieve significant improvements in clinical parameters. Numerous approaches have been used for implant surface decontamination during per-implant surgery, including mechanical, chemical and laser treatments. Conventional mechanical means don't seem to be effective on peri-implant diseases. In addition, the rough implant surface is a retentive factor for bacterial colonization and therefore makes implant surface difficult to debride. Another problem in maintaining implant health concerns the presence or absence of keratinised tissue around implant: if present, it seams to help the patient to maintain an optimal level of oral hygiene around implant and therefore the implant survival itself. The aim of the present randomized controlled clinical trial is to assess the influence of keratinised tissue around implant in improving clinical parameters. In particular, implant surface will be decontaminated mechanically with titanium curettes and chemically using chlorhexidine; after this a CTG around tissue implant will be randomized

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
July 2, 2018
End Date
December 31, 2021
Last Updated
5 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Marco Clementini

Principal Investigator

Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • presence of at least one screw-type titanium implant exhibiting bleeding and/or suppuration on probing combined with:
  • PPD ≥ 5 mm and bone loss ≥ 2 mm (compared to crestal bone levels at the time of placement of the reconstruction)
  • PPD ≥6 and bone loss ≥3 (not compared to crestal bone levels at the time of placement of the reconstruction)
  • single tooth and bridgework restorations without overhangs no evidence of occlusal overload (i.e. occlusal contacts revealed appropriate adjustment),
  • treated chronic periodontitis and proper periodontal maintenance care FMPS \< 20%
  • non-smoker or light smoking status in smokers (\<10 cigarettes per day) implant function time ≥ 1 year.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients with uncontrolled diabetes
  • patients with osteoporosis or under bisphosphonate medication,
  • pregnant or lactating women
  • patients with a history of radiotherapy to the head and neck region hollow implants
  • implant mobility
  • implants at which no position could be identified where proper probing measurements could be performed;
  • previous surgical treatment of the peri-implantitis lesions

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Bleeding on probing changes

Time Frame: baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment

changes of bleeding on probing, evaluated as present if bleeding will be evident within 30 s after probing, or absent, if no bleeding will be noticed within 30 s after probing

Secondary Outcomes

  • probing pocket depth changes(baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment)
  • bone level changes(baseline and 12 months after treatment)
  • clinical attachment level changes(baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment)
  • mucosal recession changes(baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials