Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02929628
NCT02929628UnknownPhase 2

Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness Between Various Frequency Stimulation and Traditional High Frequency Stimulation for the Treatment of Patients With Parkinson's Disease

Beijing Pins Medical Co., Ltd0 sites106 target enrollmentStarted: December 1, 2016Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Phase 2
Enrollment
106
Primary Endpoint
Changs in the score of Stand-Walk-Sit Test

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Patients with an implantable electrical nerve stimulation system Patient criteria included: over 18 years of age,MMSE≥ 24 score; H-Y stage in medicine off condition>2.0;an ability to walk at least 10 meters independently;subscore≥2 for UPDRS part II item 15;subscore >1 for UPDRS part II item 14; permissions given by informed consent. Patients with serious diseases such as tumor, sever liver or kidney dysfunction were not selected in the clinical trials. Subjects participating in other clinical trials related or not related to these trials were not chosen.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 85 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Age >18 years of age,male or female patients
  • •idiopathic Parkinson's disease
  • •had deep brain stimulaton implant
  • •H-Y>2.0 in the absence of L-dopa
  • •UPDRSII-14 item ≥1
  • •UPDRSII-15 item ≥2
  • •an ability to walk at least 10 meters independently

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Patients with serious diseases such as tumor, sever liver or kidney dysfunction were not selected in the clinical trials
  • •Pregnant female
  • •History of severe neuropsychiatric disease
  • •Patients are taking part in other clinical trials in recent several months

Arms & Interventions

Patients with Various Frequency Stimulation

Experimental

Patients are in the condition of Various Frequency Stimulation

Intervention: Beijing PINS Programming (Device)

Patients With Traditional Frequency Stimulation

Sham Comparator

Patients in the condition of Sham Comparator are Traditional Frequency Stimulation

Intervention: Beijing PINS Programming (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Changs in the score of Stand-Walk-Sit Test

Time Frame: 1、3、6 and 12 month

Secondary Outcomes

  • Change of the score in PDQ-39(1、3、6、12 months of Various Frequency Stimulation)
  • Change of the score in the FOG-Q(1、3、6、12 month of Various Frequency Stimulation)
  • Change of the score in UPDRS(1,3,6,12 months of Various Frequency Stimulation)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Industry
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Similar Trials