MedPath

Evaluation of Vitoss With and Without BMA for Benign Cavitary Lesions

Conditions
Bone Diseases
Interventions
Device: Vitoss
Registration Number
NCT02165943
Lead Sponsor
Orthovita d/b/a Stryker
Brief Summary

This is a retrospective, two-arm study reviewing the healing of cavitary defects in patients treated with Vitoss alone versus those treated with Vitoss with bone marrow aspirate (BMA). There will be a prospective follow-up visit at 24+ months to evaluate lont-term healing in patients identified during the retrospective portion of the study. It is thought that the inclusion of BMA will facilitate the resorption of the graft material, leading to better long-term bone healing.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
100
Inclusion Criteria
  • males and females >/= 18 years of age at the time of surgery
  • Patients treated with Vitoss alone or Vitoss with added BMA between 2004 and 2012
  • willing and able to provide Informed Consent to participate in and follow study requirements (including a radiologic assessment)
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients with a known post-traumatic defect
  • active infection at the time of implantation
  • history of bone marrow disorders
  • contraindications to the use of supplemental BMA

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Vitoss Bone Graft with BMAVitossPatients with a benign bone lesion of the extremity or pelvis for which surgical curettage age was recommended and who received Vitoss bone graft with BMA to fill the cavity.
Vitoss bone graftVitossPatients with a benign bone lesion of the extremity or pelvis for which surgical curettage was recommended and who received Vitoss bone graft to fill the cavity.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percentage of Vitoss resorption into the native bone as observed via CTminimum of 24 months post-operatively

Percentage of Vitoss resorption into the native bone will be retrospectively recorded in the Case Report Form at the 6 week, 3, 6, 12 and 18 month timepoints based on review of x-rays as well.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Presence of a rim of radiolucency surrounding the grafted defect as observed by CTminimum of 24 months post-operatively

Presence of a rim of radiolucency surrounding the grafted defect will be retrospectively recorded in the Case Report Form at the 6 week, 3, 6, 12 and 18 month timepoints based on review of x-rays as well.

Bone trabeculation through the defect as observed by CTminimum of 24 months post-operatively

Bone trabeculation through the defect will be retrospectively recorded in the Case Report Form at the 6 week, 3, 6, 12 and 18 month timepoints based on review of x-rays as well.

Size of the defect as observed by CTminimum of 24 months post-operatively

The size of the defect will be retrospectively recorded in the Case Report Form at the 6 week, 3, 6, 12 and 18 month timepoints based on review of x-rays as well.

Persistence of graft material through the lesion as observed by CTminimum of 24 months post-operatively

Persistence of graft material through the lesion will be retrospectively recorded in the Case Report Form at the 6 week, 3, 6, 12 and 18 month timepoints based on review of x-rays as well.

Presence of graft within the soft tissue as observed by CTminimum of 24 months post-operatively

Presence of the graft within the soft tissue will be retrospectively recorded in the Case Report Form at the 6 week, 3, 6, 12 and 18 month timepoints based on review of x-rays as well.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Upstate Orthopedics, LLC

🇺🇸

Syracuse, New York, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath