Evaluation of Vitoss With and Without BMA for Benign Cavitary Lesions
- Conditions
- Bone Diseases
- Interventions
- Device: Vitoss
- Registration Number
- NCT02165943
- Lead Sponsor
- Orthovita d/b/a Stryker
- Brief Summary
This is a retrospective, two-arm study reviewing the healing of cavitary defects in patients treated with Vitoss alone versus those treated with Vitoss with bone marrow aspirate (BMA). There will be a prospective follow-up visit at 24+ months to evaluate lont-term healing in patients identified during the retrospective portion of the study. It is thought that the inclusion of BMA will facilitate the resorption of the graft material, leading to better long-term bone healing.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 100
- males and females >/= 18 years of age at the time of surgery
- Patients treated with Vitoss alone or Vitoss with added BMA between 2004 and 2012
- willing and able to provide Informed Consent to participate in and follow study requirements (including a radiologic assessment)
- Patients with a known post-traumatic defect
- active infection at the time of implantation
- history of bone marrow disorders
- contraindications to the use of supplemental BMA
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Vitoss Bone Graft with BMA Vitoss Patients with a benign bone lesion of the extremity or pelvis for which surgical curettage age was recommended and who received Vitoss bone graft with BMA to fill the cavity. Vitoss bone graft Vitoss Patients with a benign bone lesion of the extremity or pelvis for which surgical curettage was recommended and who received Vitoss bone graft to fill the cavity.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percentage of Vitoss resorption into the native bone as observed via CT minimum of 24 months post-operatively Percentage of Vitoss resorption into the native bone will be retrospectively recorded in the Case Report Form at the 6 week, 3, 6, 12 and 18 month timepoints based on review of x-rays as well.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Presence of a rim of radiolucency surrounding the grafted defect as observed by CT minimum of 24 months post-operatively Presence of a rim of radiolucency surrounding the grafted defect will be retrospectively recorded in the Case Report Form at the 6 week, 3, 6, 12 and 18 month timepoints based on review of x-rays as well.
Bone trabeculation through the defect as observed by CT minimum of 24 months post-operatively Bone trabeculation through the defect will be retrospectively recorded in the Case Report Form at the 6 week, 3, 6, 12 and 18 month timepoints based on review of x-rays as well.
Size of the defect as observed by CT minimum of 24 months post-operatively The size of the defect will be retrospectively recorded in the Case Report Form at the 6 week, 3, 6, 12 and 18 month timepoints based on review of x-rays as well.
Persistence of graft material through the lesion as observed by CT minimum of 24 months post-operatively Persistence of graft material through the lesion will be retrospectively recorded in the Case Report Form at the 6 week, 3, 6, 12 and 18 month timepoints based on review of x-rays as well.
Presence of graft within the soft tissue as observed by CT minimum of 24 months post-operatively Presence of the graft within the soft tissue will be retrospectively recorded in the Case Report Form at the 6 week, 3, 6, 12 and 18 month timepoints based on review of x-rays as well.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Upstate Orthopedics, LLC
🇺🇸Syracuse, New York, United States