MedPath

Quadratus Lumborum Block III Versus Peritubal Local Infiltration

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Postoperative Pain
Interventions
Procedure: Quadratus block versus peritubal local infiltration
Registration Number
NCT04215705
Lead Sponsor
Ain Shams University
Brief Summary

Investigators compare post operative analgesic efficacy of peritubal local infiltration versus Quadratus Lumborum Block III . In patients undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy operation

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
80
Inclusion Criteria
  • patient with pelvic renal stone less than 2 cm
  • Americans society of Anesthesiologists physical status I, II
  • BMI<35
Exclusion Criteria
  • patient refusal to participate in the study
  • Americans society of Anesthesiologists physical status III or above
  • major hepatic, renal or cardiovascular disease
  • BMI > 35
  • coagulopathy
  • psychological disorders.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Group LQuadratus block versus peritubal local infiltrationPatients in this group receive peritubal local infiltration at 6 and 12 o'clock position with 20ml bupivacaine 0.5%
Group QQuadratus block versus peritubal local infiltrationPatients in this group receive Quadratus Lumborum Block with 20 ml bupivacaine 0.5%
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Postoperative analgesia24 hours

Postoperative pain measured by visual analogue scale from 0 to 10 measured over 24h where 0 is better and 10 means worst pain

Analgesic requirement24 hours

Investigators measured the total dose of morphine consumption in mg over 24hour

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Ain Shams University hosptal

🇪🇬

Cairo, Abbasya, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath