跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00662701
NCT00662701已完成不适用

Atrial Fibrillation: Ablation or Surgical Treatment; A Randomized Study Comparing Non-pharmacologic Therapy in Patients With Drug-refractory Atrial Fibrillation

St. Antonius Hospital3 个研究点 分布在 2 个国家目标入组 120 人开始时间: 2007年5月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
120
试验地点
3
主要终点
Freedom from AF and/or secondary left atrial arrhythmias, lasting >60 sec, as determined by 7 day continuous Holter monitoring.

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this study is to compare 2 invasive strategies for Atrial Fibrillation treatment, Endocardial catheter ablation isolation of the Pulmonary veins versus minimally invasive thoracoscopic surgical epicardial isolation. Both strategies are in use for several years now, and have been reported as a successful strategy with success rates of 60-90%. However, it is not known which technique is preferable in a given patient population in terms of efficacy to cure AF, safety, or patient discomfort. Therefore, in the present trial a randomized study is proposed to provide more insight into the relative merits of both techniques

详细描述

Atrial Fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmia, affecting millions of people around the world. It is a large burden on health care resources and may even lead to a shorter life expectancy. Drug treatment has been found insufficient and sometimes even hazardous to the pt. Traditionally, there was only one invasive approach available, being MAZE 3 procedure by means of full open chest cardiac surgery. This was a very invasive approach, limited to only a few skilled surgeons, with insufficient options to treat large pt volume.

With the discovery that AF often is initiated and maintained by electrical instability inside and around the Pulmonary Veins, catheter ablation is now a widely accepted early invasive strategy to cure AF. Success rates of 60% to 90% have been reported, depending on technique employed and the type of AF (Resp, chronic versus paroxysmal)

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
30 Years 至 70 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patient has a history of symptomatic paroxysmal and/or persistent atrial fibrillation for at least 12 months
  • Patient is refractory to or intolerant of at least one antiarrhythmic drug
  • Patient has an enlarged atrium >40 mm and/or Patient has a failed previous catheter ablation and/or Patient has additional risk factors such as hypertension, increasing age
  • Patient is between 30 and 70 years of age
  • Patient is mentally able and willing to give informed consent

排除标准

  • Cardiac ablation or surgical cardiac procedure in the last 3 months
  • Previous cardiac tamponade
  • Previous stroke or TIA
  • Left atrial thrombus
  • Left atrial size >65 mm
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction <45 %
  • Active infection or sepsis
  • Pregnancy
  • Unstable angina
  • Myocardial infarction (MI) within previous 3 months
  • Atrial fibrillation is secondary to electrolyte imbalance, thyroid disease, or other reversible or non-cardiovascular cause
  • History of blood clotting abnormalities
  • Known sensitivity to heparin or warfarin
  • Life expectancy is less than 12 months
  • Patient is involved in another clinical study involving an investigational drug or device
  • Pleural adhesions
  • Prior thoracotomy
  • Prior cardiac surgery
  • Elevated hemi diaphragm

结局指标

主要结局

Freedom from AF and/or secondary left atrial arrhythmias, lasting >60 sec, as determined by 7 day continuous Holter monitoring.

时间窗: 6 months

Safety and/or adverse events

时间窗: 6 months

次要结局

  • Freedom of AADs, Decrease in the frequency and duration of AF episodes, Decrease in the number of AF related hospital admissions, Improvement in quality of life internet Follow Up, Decrease in number of cardioversions, PM implant(6 and 12 Months)
  • Composite major complications, Serious Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Effects(12 Months)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Lucas Boersma

Cardiologist

St. Antonius Hospital

研究点 (3)

Loading locations...

相似试验