Atrial Fibrillation: Ablation or Surgical Treatment; A Randomized Study Comparing Non-pharmacologic Therapy in Patients With Drug-refractory Atrial Fibrillation
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Atrial Fibrillation
- Sponsor
- St. Antonius Hospital
- Enrollment
- 120
- Locations
- 2
- Primary Endpoint
- Freedom from AF and/or secondary left atrial arrhythmias, lasting >60 sec, as determined by 7 day continuous Holter monitoring.
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 10 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare 2 invasive strategies for Atrial Fibrillation treatment, Endocardial catheter ablation isolation of the Pulmonary veins versus minimally invasive thoracoscopic surgical epicardial isolation. Both strategies are in use for several years now, and have been reported as a successful strategy with success rates of 60-90%. However, it is not known which technique is preferable in a given patient population in terms of efficacy to cure AF, safety, or patient discomfort. Therefore, in the present trial a randomized study is proposed to provide more insight into the relative merits of both techniques
Detailed Description
Atrial Fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmia, affecting millions of people around the world. It is a large burden on health care resources and may even lead to a shorter life expectancy. Drug treatment has been found insufficient and sometimes even hazardous to the pt. Traditionally, there was only one invasive approach available, being MAZE 3 procedure by means of full open chest cardiac surgery. This was a very invasive approach, limited to only a few skilled surgeons, with insufficient options to treat large pt volume. With the discovery that AF often is initiated and maintained by electrical instability inside and around the Pulmonary Veins, catheter ablation is now a widely accepted early invasive strategy to cure AF. Success rates of 60% to 90% have been reported, depending on technique employed and the type of AF (Resp, chronic versus paroxysmal)
Investigators
Lucas Boersma
Cardiologist
St. Antonius Hospital
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Patient has a history of symptomatic paroxysmal and/or persistent atrial fibrillation for at least 12 months
- •Patient is refractory to or intolerant of at least one antiarrhythmic drug
- •Patient has an enlarged atrium \>40 mm and/or Patient has a failed previous catheter ablation and/or Patient has additional risk factors such as hypertension, increasing age
- •Patient is between 30 and 70 years of age
- •Patient is mentally able and willing to give informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
- •Cardiac ablation or surgical cardiac procedure in the last 3 months
- •Previous cardiac tamponade
- •Previous stroke or TIA
- •Left atrial thrombus
- •Left atrial size \>65 mm
- •Left ventricular ejection fraction \<45 %
- •Active infection or sepsis
- •Pregnancy
- •Unstable angina
- •Myocardial infarction (MI) within previous 3 months
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Freedom from AF and/or secondary left atrial arrhythmias, lasting >60 sec, as determined by 7 day continuous Holter monitoring.
Time Frame: 6 months
Safety and/or adverse events
Time Frame: 6 months
Secondary Outcomes
- Freedom of AADs, Decrease in the frequency and duration of AF episodes, Decrease in the number of AF related hospital admissions, Improvement in quality of life internet Follow Up, Decrease in number of cardioversions, PM implant(6 and 12 Months)
- Composite major complications, Serious Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Effects(12 Months)