Comparison of an Electronic Version of Selected COPD PRO Instruments With the Original Versions
- Conditions
- COPD
- Registration Number
- NCT01875302
- Lead Sponsor
- nSpire Health, Inc.
- Brief Summary
This protocol defines the requirements to demonstrate that the PRO instruments which were designed as paper-based are equivalent to the nSpire Health ePRO (electronic patient reported outcome), following the ISPOR's ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force recommendations. All validation studies of the questionnaires were conducted using the original paper versions.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 20
- Give their signed written informed consent to participate
- Current symptoms COPD, as diagnosed by a physician
- Age 40 - 75 years
- Able to read and understand English
• Unwilling to complete the 3 electronic PRO questionnaires or participate in an interview during completion of questionnaires
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Demonstrate that the following PRO instruments which were designed as paper-based are equivalent to the nSpire Health ePRO (electronic patient reported outcome) 60 minutes The primary measures to demonstrate equivalency of electronic to paper PRO instruments are Usability and Cognitive Debriefing.
Usability data is gathered using systematic observation under controlled conditions to determine how well the device may be used by subjects.
Qualitative, Content Analysis of Cognitive Debriefing Data The cognitive debriefing data will be content analyzed for subject understanding of the instructions on the device used to deliver the PRO instrument.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method