NCT02168881
Unknown
Not Applicable
Oral Misoprostol Versus Vaginal Dinoprostone For Induction Of Labour: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Misoprostol
- Conditions
- Labour Induction
- Sponsor
- Ain Shams University
- Enrollment
- 342
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- induction delivery time
- Last Updated
- 11 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
This study is to compare between oral misoprostol in solution and vaginal dinoprostone in induction of labour in primiparous women with singleton pregnancy as regards efficiency and safety to both mother and fetus.
Investigators
Marwan Elkady
Dr
Ain Shams University
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Primigravida
Exclusion Criteria
- •Scarred uterus
- •Macrosomia
Arms & Interventions
misoprostol
oral misoprostol in solution 25 microgram every 2 hours
Intervention: Misoprostol
dinoprostone
3 mgs dinoprostone vaginally every six hours
Intervention: Dinoprostone
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
induction delivery time
Time Frame: 2 hourly
Study Sites (1)
Loading locations...
Similar Trials
Unknown
Phase 3
Titrated Oral Misoprostol Compared to Vaginal Dinoprostone for Induction of LaborMedical Induction of Labor Affecting FetusNCT02036437Ain Shams University200
Unknown
Phase 4
Comparison of Vaginal Misoprostol and Dinoprostone Prior to Copper Intrauterine Device Insertion in Women Delivered Only by Cesarean DeliveryIUD PainNCT04080349Cairo University300
Completed
Phase 4
Comparison of Vaginal Misoprostol and Dinoprostone Prior to Copper Intrauterine Device Insertion in Nulliparous WomenIUD Insertion ComplicationNCT04080336Cairo University129
Unknown
Not Applicable
Vaginal Misoprostol and Dinoprostone Prior to Copper Intrauterine Device Insertion in WomenIUCD ComplicationNCT04505917Aswan University Hospital200
Completed
Phase 4
Vaginal Dinoprostone Versus Vaginal Misoprostol Prior to Diagnostic Office Hysteroscopy in Postmenopausal PatientsOffice HysteroscopyNCT04044079Cairo University150