Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02168881
NCT02168881UnknownNot Applicable

Oral Misoprostol Versus Vaginal Dinoprostone For Induction Of Labour: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Ain Shams University1 site in 1 country342 target enrollmentStarted: May 2014Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions
Drugs

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Enrollment
342
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
induction delivery time

Study Overview

Brief Summary

This study is to compare between oral misoprostol in solution and vaginal dinoprostone in induction of labour in primiparous women with singleton pregnancy as regards efficiency and safety to both mother and fetus.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Sex
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Primigravida

Exclusion Criteria

  • Scarred uterus
  • Macrosomia

Arms & Interventions

misoprostol

Active Comparator

oral misoprostol in solution 25 microgram every 2 hours

Intervention: Misoprostol (Drug)

dinoprostone

Active Comparator

3 mgs dinoprostone vaginally every six hours

Intervention: Dinoprostone (Drug)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

induction delivery time

Time Frame: 2 hourly

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Marwan Elkady

Dr

Ain Shams University

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials