跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05663203
NCT05663203招募中不适用

A Web-Based Dyadic Intervention to Manage Psychoneurological Symptoms for Patients With Colorectal Cancer and Their Caregivers

Emory University2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 56 人开始时间: 2023年5月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
入组人数
56
试验地点
2
主要终点
Attrition Rate

研究概览

简要总结

This clinical trial studies how well a web-based dyadic intervention works to manage psychoneurological symptoms for patients with colorectal cancer and their caregivers. Patients with colorectal cancer receiving chemotherapy experience severe and distressing psychoneurological symptoms that include fatigue, depression, sleep disturbance, pain, and cognitive dysfunction. When these co-occurring symptoms are undertreated, they negatively affect functional status, survival rates, and quality of life of patients as well as decrease health outcomes of their family caregiver. A critical need exists to develop an effective and novel intervention that focuses on patients with colorectal cancer receiving chemotherapy and their caregivers. A web-based dyadic intervention holds great promise to reduce psychoneurological symptoms burden and improve quality of life for patients with colorectal cancer receiving chemotherapy and advance intervention development and implementation in cancer supportive care and health equity.

详细描述

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To develop a web-based dyadic intervention for patients with colorectal cancer receiving chemotherapy and their caregivers (CRCweb).

Ia. Determine tailored contents by identifying needs and supports for a web-based dyadic intervention using interviews with patient-caregiver dyads (n=8); Ib. Develop a prototype of a web-based dyadic intervention program (CRCweb); Ic. Test the usability (e.g., design, navigation, structure, language) of CRCweb prototype using interviews with 4 dyads (in Aim Ia).

II. Evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of CRCweb for patients with colorectal cancer receiving chemotherapy and their caregivers in 20 dyads in a pilot clinical trial.

III. Evaluate the preliminary effects of CRCweb on the primary outcome (i.e., attrition, adherence, acceptability, fatigue, depression, sleep disturbance, pain, and cognitive dysfunction) and secondary outcomes (i.e., quality of life) for patients with colorectal cancer receiving chemotherapy and their caregivers in 20 dyads in a pilot clinical trial.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Supportive Care
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • 未提供

排除标准

  • 未提供

结局指标

主要结局

Attrition Rate

时间窗: Up to week 8

Collect attendance records from each dyad before and after modules. The intervention will be considered to be high attrition if \> 80% dyads remain enrolled. Feasibility of study participation will be assessed by calculating retention rates, identifying reasons for refusal and assessing completeness of the data.

Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory

时间窗: Up to week 8

Fatigue will be measured using the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI). The MFI is a 20-item self-reported instrument that includes five dimensions of fatigue: general fatigue, physical fatigue, mental fatigue, reduced motivation, and reduced activity. Each dimension includes four items on a 1-5 scale. The total score, ranging from 20 to 100 (higher scores indicating more severe fatigue) is calculated as the sum of the five dimensions. The MFI has well established validity and reliability.

Acceptability Rate

时间窗: Up to week 8

A survey will be created for this study to assess participants' perceptions of acceptability of the study procedures (\> 80% of participants reporting intervention is considered as high acceptability). Participants' perceptions of acceptability of the study procedures and of the intervention itself will be evaluated by calculating descriptive statistics to summarize responses to the post-intervention surveys as well as post-intervention interviews using content analysis.

Adherence Rate

时间窗: Up to week 8

It is determined by high adherence if dyads complete \> 80% of the intervention protocol

Patient Health Questionnaire

时间窗: Up to week 8

Depression will be measured using the eight-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8), a well-established valid and reliable self-administered diagnostic measure for depressive disorders in clinical studies. The PHQ-8 asks the number of days in the past 2 weeks the respondent has experienced a variety of depressive symptoms. Each item is scored from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day); the sum of each item is the total score (0 to 24). Patients with a cutoff score of more than 10, clinically significant depression, will be referred to a clinical psychiatrist for further assistance.

Brief Pain Inventory

时间窗: Up to week 8

Pain will be assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). Participants will rate the intensity of the pain (i.e., now, average, worst) using 0 (none) to 10 (excruciating) numeric rating scales (NRS). In addition, they will provide information on the length of time they are in pain, how often their pain occurs, locations of their pain, quality of the pain, pain's level of interference with function, and their level of pain relief and satisfaction with pain treatment.

Attentional Function Index

时间窗: Up to week 8

Attentional Function Index (AFI) consists of 16 items designed to measure cognitive dysfunction. A higher total mean score on a 0 to 10 NRS indicates a greater capacity to direct attention. Total scores are grouped into categories of attentional function (i.e., \<5.0 low function, 5.0 to 7.5 moderate function, \>7.5 high function). In addition, the AFI has three subscales (i.e., effective action, attentional lapses, and interpersonal effectiveness). The AFI has well established reliability and validity.)

Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index

时间窗: Up to week 8

Sleep disturbance will be assessed by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Its validity and reliability have been established in various populations, including patients with cancer. The PSQI consists of 19 items assessing sleep disturbances in seven dimensions (i.e., subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleep medication, and daytime dysfunction). Each dimension scores from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (severe difficulty), and the sum of these dimension scores is the global sleep quality (0 to 21). Higher scores indicate more difficulty in sleeping.

次要结局

  • Short Form Health Survey(Up to week 8)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Yufen Lin

Principal Investigator

Emory University

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验