MedPath

Quetiapine Versus Haloperidol in the Management of Hyperactive Delirium

Phase 3
Completed
Conditions
Hyperactive Delirium
Interventions
Drug: Quatiapine
Registration Number
NCT05690698
Lead Sponsor
Alexandria University
Brief Summary

In population of intensive care unit (ICU), most studies compared atypical antipsychotics such as quetiapine with the traditional haloperidol in delirious patients of various forms and etiologies. The role of such agents in patients with hyperactive is not fully understood.

This study compares the effectiveness of quetiapine with haloperidol in treating the hyperactive form of delirium in terms of their effects on morbidity, length of stay in the intensive care unit, and mortality in critically ill patients.

Detailed Description

A common complication in the intensive care unit (ICU) that has recently been identified is delirium. Defining delirium as a "sudden deterioration in attention, awareness, and cognition, which is not explained by any pre-existing neurocognitive disorder, but because of another medical condition," the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-V) clarified the definition of delirium.

A dibenzothiazepine derivative with a novel and distinctive pharmacologic profile is quetiapine. The limbic system is overactive in delirium, which is one of its pathophysiologies. By obstructing the mesolimbic dopamine D2 receptors specifically, quetiapine may be able to regulate this hyperactivity.

The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of quetiapine with haloperidol in treating the hyperactive form of delirium in terms of their effects on morbidity, length of stay in ICU, and mortality in critically ill patients.

This research will not receive any grants, funding, or financial aid (NOT FUNDED STUDY). Collaborators declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
100
Inclusion Criteria
  • All patients who are diagnosed with hyperactive form of delirium during their ICU stay using CAM-ICU tool (the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit)
Exclusion Criteria
  • Suspected substance-induced delirium
  • Previous use of antipsychotics
  • Known allergy or intolerance to the study drugs
  • Pregnancy or breast feeding
  • Acute renal injury
  • Hepatic failure
  • Inability to tolerate oral drugs

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Quatiapine group (n=50)QuatiapineQuetiapine (25-50 mg/day) according to their symptoms of agitations.
Haloperidol group (n=50)HaloperidolHaloperidol (1-2 mg/day) according to their symptoms of agitations.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Response rateDay 7

Response rate is defined as a reduction of the DRS-R-98 severity score from its baseline for 50% or more and a DRS-R-98 severity score of 12 or less without relapse

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
In-hospital mortalityweek 6 from enrollment

In-hospital all cause mortality

ICU-mortalityweek 6 from enrollment

ICU all cause mortality

Need for MVweek 6 from enrollment

Need for mechanical ventilation during ICU stay

ICU stayweek 6 from enrollment

Number of days of ICU stay

Hospital stayweek 6 from enrollment

Number of days of hospital stay

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University Hospitals

🇪🇬

Alexandria, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath