MedPath

Trial in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT): Right Ventricular Apex Versus High Posterior Septum

Phase 2
Conditions
Heart Failure
Interventions
Device: CRT in heart failure; Right ventricular apex v.s. high posterior septum
Registration Number
NCT01035489
Lead Sponsor
Haukeland University Hospital
Brief Summary

In heart failure patients we hypothesised that right ventricular high posterior septum is superior to right ventricular apex in CRT and DDD pacemaker. In two separate trials we prospectively randomized the right ventricular lead placement to find evidence of differences in heart failure symptoms (NYHA-class), 6 minute hall walk and echocardiographic measurements of reverse remodelling and dyssynchrony.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
85
Inclusion Criteria
  • CRT:

    • LVEF < 35%
    • LVEDD > 5.5 cm
    • NYHA 3-4
    • QRS > 120 ms
    • Optimal medical treatment
    • Both CRT-pacemakers (CRT-P) and CRT combined with ICD (CRT-D)
Exclusion Criteria
  • Not fulfilling inclusion criteria or not written consensus

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
CRT; RV apical lead placementCRT in heart failure; Right ventricular apex v.s. high posterior septumRight ventricular apical lead placement in CRT
CRT; RV high posterior septumCRT in heart failure; Right ventricular apex v.s. high posterior septumHigh posterior septal lead placement in CRT
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Echocardiographic reverse remodelling and dyssynchrony3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Haukeland University Hospital

🇳🇴

Bergen, Norway

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath