跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02950532
NCT02950532已完成不适用

Posterior Ligament Complex Assessment Without Magnetic Resonance Image in Thoracolumbar Fractures (T11-L2): A Diagnostic Test Study to Analyze Sensitivity and Specificity

AO Clinical Investigation and Publishing Documentation5 个研究点 分布在 5 个国家目标入组 60 人开始时间: 2016年10月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
60
试验地点
5
主要终点
Sensitivity of Local kyphosis (LK) and/or Inter-spinous distanceI (SD)

研究概览

简要总结

The objective of this investigation is to confirm the results obtained in a pilot study showing that certain radiological parameters based on computed tomography (CT) scans seem to reliably detect posterior ligament complex (PLC) injury without the need for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

详细描述

Integrity of posterior ligament complex (PLC) has an important bearing on the treatment strategies for thoracolumbar (TL) fractures. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is the gold standard to confirm PLC injury. The routine use of MRI has its limitations especially since in most trauma centers MRI is not the primary assessment for TL fractures due to reduced availability, increased cost and its adverse applicability in trauma setting and in case of a polytrauma. In contrast computed tomography (CT) scans are an integral part of trauma evaluation protocols, are accurate in spine fracture diagnosis and are performed in less time, making them suitable to assess polytrauma scenarios. In a recent pilot study, a number of radiological parameters based on CT scans have shown to reliably detect PLC injury when compared to MRI. The aim of the study is to reconfirm and validate these CT based parameters to assess PLC injury compared to MRI.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Retrospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 60 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Age 18 to 60 years
  • A3/A4 TL fracture between T11-L2 with or without PLC injury
  • Pre-treatment CT scan and MRI. Radiographs (if available)
  • Signed Informed consent, if required by EC/IRB

排除标准

  • Pathological fractures
  • Multilevel contiguous and non-contiguous injuries
  • Fractures with obvious spinous process split indicating tension band failure such as AO type B1 injuries
  • Fractures with translation injuries or dislocations such as AO type C injuries

结局指标

主要结局

Sensitivity of Local kyphosis (LK) and/or Inter-spinous distanceI (SD)

时间窗: CT scans, MRI and x-rays were taken on admission into hospital after the patient got a thoracolumbar fracture. These images will be retrospectively analyzed (eligible images are from the date of the fracture up to 3 days after the event).

Sensitivity of LK and/or ISD Is defined as the proportion of patients with PLC injury correctly diagnosed by an increase in LK and/or ISD difference compared to MRI. The Specificity si defined as the proportion of patients with PLC injury correctly diagnosed by an increase in LK and/or ISD difference compared to MRI. The gold standard is a diagnostic test and it is the best accepted test that is assumed to be able to determine the true disease state. It is considered as the reference method or the best test available.

次要结局

  • Sensitivity and specificity of vertebral body height (BH)(CT scans, MRI and x-rays were taken on admission into hospital after the patient got a thoracolumbar fracture. These images will be retrospectively analyzed (eligible images are from the date of the fracture up to 3 days after the event).)
  • Sensitivity and specificity of inter-pedicular distance (IPD)(CT scans, MRI and x-rays were taken on admission into hospital after the patient got a thoracolumbar fracture. These images will be retrospectively analyzed (eligible images are from the date of the fracture up to 3 days after the event).)
  • Sensitivity and specificity of superior-inferior end plate angle (SIEA)(CT scans, MRI and x-rays were taken on admission into hospital after the patient got a thoracolumbar fracture. These images will be retrospectively analyzed (eligible images are from the date of the fracture up to 3 days after the event).)

研究者

发起方
AO Clinical Investigation and Publishing Documentation
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (5)

Loading locations...

相似试验