跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05006209
NCT05006209已完成不适用

Comparison of One-visit Root Canal Treatment Using Chlorhexidine as a Final Irrigant and Conventional Two-visit Root Canal Treatment

Ege University0 个研究点目标入组 100 人开始时间: 2016年6月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
100
主要终点
Changes in the size and the PAI score of the periapical lesion

研究概览

简要总结

A hundred asymptomatic molar teeth with periapical lesions were treated in single versus multiple visit root canal treatment. Half of the teeth were randomly assigned to the one-visit (OV) group and received an additional final rinse with 2% CHX before obturation. The other teeth were treated in two visits (TV) with calcium hydroxide dressing. All patients were recalled and investigated clinically and radiographically for 48 months

详细描述

The aim of the study was to evaluate the radiographic evidence of periapical healing in teeth with apical periodontitis treated in a single visit with an additional final irrigation using 2% chlorhexidine and to compare the results with conventional multiple-visit root canal treatment (RCT) with an intracanal calcium hydroxide dressing as a control group. 100 asymptomatic molar teeth with periapical lesions were treated using engine-driven nickel-titanium (NiTi) instrumentation with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and 5% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) as irrigants. Half of the teeth were randomly assigned to the one-visit (OV) group and received an additional final rinse with 2% chlorhexidine (CHX) before obturation. The other teeth were treated in two visits (TV), after completion of root canal instrumentation calcium hydroxide paste was placed into the root canal and root canal obturation was performed in second visit. All patients were recalled and investigated clinically and radiographically for 48 months. Changes in apical bone density indicating radiographic healing were evaluated.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • with a non-contributory medical history,
  • mature molar teeth with periapical lesions,
  • diagnosed as asymptomatic apical periodontitis

排除标准

  • clinical symptoms, drainage,
  • more than 5 mm loss of periodontal attachment,
  • previous endodontic treatment,
  • non-restorable tooth

结局指标

主要结局

Changes in the size and the PAI score of the periapical lesion

时间窗: 48 months

The rate of radiographic healing of the periapical lesion. Follow-up visits were performed for all patients in order to evaluate radiographic status. Changes in apical bone density indicating radiographic healing was assessed using Periapical Index (PAI)(Orstavik 1986) as the scoring system.

Clinical healing according to presence of clinical symptoms

时间窗: 48 months

All patients were called for follow up visits. The clinical healing was determined by examining clinical symptoms including presence of pain, tenderness to percussion and palpation, presence of sinus tract or swelling, and mobility.If one of these symptoms occurs, it is considered as failure..

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Seniha Miçooğulları Kurt

Principle investigator, Asst. Assoc. Dr

Ege University

相似试验

One-visit Root Canal Treatment Using Chlorhexidine... | 临床试验