Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02705027
NCT02705027
Unknown
Not Applicable

Randomized, Controlled Comparison of Two Endoscopically Placed Nasojejunal Probes in Critically Ill Patients in Terms of Application Time and Technical Success

Ruhr University of Bochum2 sites in 1 country64 target enrollmentAugust 2012

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Investigation Time
Sponsor
Ruhr University of Bochum
Enrollment
64
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Examination time for the probe system
Last Updated
10 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

A direct application of jejunal tube feeding is necessary especially in patients with gastroparesis due of existing diabetes mellitus, postoperative or severe underlying disease. Since the jejunal tube feedings, the secretion of gastric juice can be increased, the use of probes that allow both: jejunal nutrition, as well as a gastric outflow of secretions are beneficial.

While in a randomized trial of Schwab et al. it could be shown that the use of Freka-Trilumina® compared to Dobbhoff probe by so-called drag technique is significantly faster there are currently no comparative data to use the Easy-In® probe subsequently developed , which is directly introduced through the working channel of the endoscope, and thus shortening the procedure time.

Detailed Description

The use of probes nasojejunal has increasingly become important especially in critically ill patients because of the beneficial effect in patients e.g. with necrotizing pancreatitis, according trauma or major surgical procedures. A direct application of jejunal tube feeding is necessary especially in patients with gastroparesis due of existing diabetes mellitus, postoperative or severe underlying disease. Since the jejunal tube feedings, the secretion of gastric juice can be increased, the use of probes that allow both: jejunal nutrition, as well as a gastric outflow of secretions are beneficial. While in a randomized trial of Schwab et al. it could be shown that the use of Freka-Trilumina® compared to Dobbhoff probe by so-called drag technique is significantly faster there are currently no comparative data to use the Easy-In® probe subsequently developed , which is directly introduced through the working channel of the endoscope, and thus shortening the procedure time. In the presented study should be investigated to what extent the use of imported directly via the working channel Easy-Inn® probe, application time and thus the investigation period may be shortened compared to the usual nasojenunal probes.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
August 2012
End Date
August 2016
Last Updated
10 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Ruhr University of Bochum
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Andrea Riphaus

PD Dr.

Ruhr University of Bochum

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Clinical indication for enteral feeding via naso-jejunal probe

Exclusion Criteria

  • Lack of consent of the patient or their relatives (in intubated and mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Examination time for the probe system

Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials