Neural Pressure Support and Non-invasive Estimation of Transpulmonary Pressure in Spontaneous Ventilation Modes

Recruiting

• Conditions: Mechanical Ventilation Complication
• Interventions: Device: Esophageal manometry and monitoring of electrical activity of the diaphragm

• Registration Number: NCT05574829
• Lead Sponsor: Fundación de Investigación Biomédica - Hospital Universitario de La Princesa

Brief Summary

The transition from controlled mechanical ventilation to assisted ventilation is one of the most complex and compromised phases of the ventilatory management during mechanical ventilation, affected by factors such as:

* Asynchronies, due to patient-respirator dis-synchrony in ins- and expiratory neural and mechanical times, as well as inadequate levels of assistance.

* Risks of self-induced lung injury resulting from uncontrolled increases in transpulmonary pressure when high inspiratory efforts are combined with inappropriate levels of inspiratory pressure assistance.

Current monitoring of assisted ventilation is complex and not well resolved by most conventional ventilators. Asynchronies are difficult to monitor with the pressure or flow/time curves present in conventional ventilators requiring an advanced level of expertise. Measurements of the patient's muscular effort and therefore of transpulmonary pressure, requires the use of esophageal manometry with cumbersome handling and interpretation.

NAVA (Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist) is a ventilator mode that uses electrical activity of the diaphragm (EAdi), monitored via a modified nasogastric feeding catheter, to control and assist the respiratory cycle by the ventilator. Recently, a "hybrid" mode between the conventional pressure support assisted mode (PSV) and NAVA called Neural-Pressure Support Ventilation (N-PSV) has been developed. This mode uses a neural trigger based on the EAdi to match the patient's and ventilator's in- and expiratory time, but unlike NAVA, assisting in the same way as in pressure support. In addition the EAdi allows to assess the extent to which the patient's muscle strength contributes to the patient-ventilator breath (PVBC), and it has recently been suggested that on the basis of PVBC it may also be possible to directly estimate the patient's transpulmonary pressure (PL).

Hypothesis:

1. EAdi allows direct estimation of PL during the assisted ventilation phase without the need of an oesophageal pressure balloon.

2. N-PSV can provide advantages over PSV by better matching ventilator and patient respiratory cycle times, thus reducing the risk of asynchronies.

Detailed Description

Consenting participants will be simultaneously monitored with a 8French EAdi catheter (to measure the electrical activity of the diaphragm) and a 15French nasogastric catheter with an oesophageal balloon to measure oesophageal manometry during the 120 min of the total study period.

After confirming correct positioning and measurement of both catheters participants will be submitted to the following protocol:

Baseline ventilation in pressure support ventilation during 30 min Baseline ventilation in neural-pressure support ventilation during 30 min Under-assistance in neural pressure support ventilation reducing the baseline level of pressure support by 50% (with a minimum of 5 cmH2O) during 30 min Over-assistance in neural pressure support ventilation by increasing the baseline level of pressure by 50% during 30 min.

The sequence of the last two steps will be randomly determined. After completing the protocol the EAdi catheter will be removed.

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2022-05-20
• Status Verified: 2022-10
• Study First Submitted: 2022-10-07
• Study First Submitted QC: 2022-10-07
• Last Update Submitted: 2022-10-11
• Study First Posted: 2022-10-12
• Last Update Posted: 2022-10-13
• Primary Completion: 2023-03-31
• Study Completion: 2023-03-31

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: RECRUITING
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 26

Inclusion Criteria

• Age > 18 years

• Mechanically assisted ventilation

• Patients with a nasogastric catheter

• Obtained informed consent

• Clinical stability, defined as:

  • Low ventilatory support requirement: FiO2 (Fraction of inspired oxygen) ≤ 0.5; PEEP (positive end-expiratory pressure) ≤ 10 cmH2O (up to 12 cmH2O for patients with a body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2).
  • Haemodynamic stability: a)low vasopressor requirement: Noradrenaline ≤ 0.2 microg/kg/min; b)Mean blood pressure ≥ 60 mmHg; c)No new arrhythmias.

Exclusion Criteria

• Presence of Contraindications for the insertion of a nasogastric tube: oesophageal pathology. Coagulopathy, bleeding diathesis
• Clinical instability

Study & Design

• Study Type: OBSERVATIONAL
• Study Design: Not specified

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Patients under pressure support ventilation	Esophageal manometry and monitoring of electrical activity of the diaphragm	Patients under assisted mechanical ventilation monitored with esophageal manometry and electrical activity of the diaphragm

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Estimation of transpulmonary pressure	90 minutes	Evaluation of a new method for measuring transpulmonary pressure based on the electrical activity of the diaphragm
Number of asynchronies	60 minutes	Asynchrony index

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Hospital Universitario de La Princesa; 🇪🇸 Madrid, Spain