Comparative study of healing after periapical surgery BY ULTRASOUND using platelet rich fibrin.

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: Health Condition 1: null- Patients with periapical pathology in maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth region.

• Registration Number: CTRI/2017/08/009415
• Lead Sponsor: Himachal Pradesh Government Dental College and Hospital Shimla

Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Results First Posted: 1900-01-01
• Study Completion: 2016-09-26
• Last Update Posted: 24 November 2021

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Sex: Not specified
• Target Recruitment: 26

Inclusion Criteria

1.The patients with no general medical contraindications for oral surgical procedures. 2.The patients with only maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth that required periradicular surgery. 3.The minimum diameter of the bone defect, as determined from periapical radiographs, to be at least 6 mm. 4.The nonsurgical re-treatment is judged unfeasible or had previously failed. 5.The apical root canal to be devoid of the presence of a post for at least 6 mm. 6. No spontaneous pain or swelling should have been present.

Exclusion Criteria

presence of any kind of pathosis associated with vertical root fracture; perforation of the furcation area or lateral canal walls; moderate to severe periodontal bone loss, detected with a periodontal probe (probing depth greater than 5 mm). Patients with neuropsychiatric disorders were also be excluded. Any general condition of patient contraindicated for surgical treatment under local anaesthesia. Age less than 21 yrs and more than 35 years were also excluded.

Study & Design

• Study Type: Interventional
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Platelet rich fibrin showed better healing of the surgical defect then the non platelet rich fibringroup.Timepoint: Healing in Platelet rich fibrin group was better then the non platelet rich fibrin group at 1,3 and 9 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Difference in healing was not significant at 1 month but the difference was significant at 3 and 6 months.Timepoint: Significant difference in healing at 3 and 6 months.