跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02559206
NCT02559206已完成2 期

A Phase 2b, Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Dose-range-finding Study of Two Delayed Release Formulations of Linaclotide Administered Orally for 12 Weeks to Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation

Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc.1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 759 人开始时间: 2015年10月22日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
2 期
状态
已完成
入组人数
759
试验地点
1
主要终点
Change From Baseline in Weekly Abdominal Pain Score Over the 12-Week Treatment Period: DR1 or IR vs. Placebo

研究概览

简要总结

The objectives of this study are to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and dose response of two delayed release formulations of linaclotide (DR; DR formulation 1 is DR1; DR formulation 2 is DR2) administered orally to patients with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C). Additional objectives include understanding how the two DR formulations compare with each other and with the FDA-approved 290 μg LINZESS® (the immediate release [IR] formulation of linaclotide).

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patient has completed a colonoscopy according to the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) criteria, with no clinically significant findings
  • Patient has no clinically significant findings on a physical examination and clinical laboratory tests
  • Patient meets protocol criteria for diagnosis of IBS-C
  • Patient demonstrates continued IBS-C through Pretreatment Period
  • Patient maintains a minimum level of compliance with daily diary

排除标准

  • Patient has history of loose or watery stools
  • Patient has symptoms of or been diagnosed with a medical condition that may contribute to abdominal pain
  • Patient has a structural abnormality of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract or a disease or condition that can affect GI motility
  • Patient has any protocol-excluded or clinically significant medical or surgical history that could confound the study assessments

研究组 & 干预措施

100 μg linaclotide DR1 and placebo

Experimental

干预措施: Linaclotide (Drug)

30 μg linaclotide DR1 and placebo

Experimental

干预措施: Linaclotide (Drug)

300 μg linaclotide DR1 and placebo

Experimental

干预措施: Linaclotide (Drug)

30 μg linaclotide DR2 and placebo

Experimental

干预措施: Linaclotide (Drug)

100 μg linaclotide DR2 and placebo

Experimental

干预措施: Linaclotide (Drug)

300 μg linaclotide DR2 and placebo

Experimental

干预措施: Linaclotide (Drug)

290 μg linaclotide IR and placebo

Experimental

干预措施: Linaclotide (Drug)

Placebo

Placebo Comparator

干预措施: Matching Placebo (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

Change From Baseline in Weekly Abdominal Pain Score Over the 12-Week Treatment Period: DR1 or IR vs. Placebo

时间窗: Baseline, up to Week 12

Abdominal pain assessment was based on an 11-point numerical rating scale (0=No symptom; 10=Worst possible) assessing the symptom "at its worst in past 24 hours." A participant's weekly abdominal pain score is the average of the nonmissing abdominal pain scores reported by the participant during each week.

Change From Baseline in Weekly CSBM Frequency Rate Over the 12-Week Treatment Period: DR2 or IR vs. Placebo

时间窗: Baseline, up to Week 12

A participant's weekly CSBM frequency rate is the CSBM rate (CSBMs/week) calculated over that week.

Number of 6/12 Week Abdominal Pain and Constipation (APC) +1 Responders Over the 12-Week Treatment Period: DR1 or IR vs. Placebo

时间窗: up to Week 12

A 6/12 Week APC +1 Responder is a participant who meets the Weekly APC +1 Responder criteria for at least 6 out of the 12 weeks of the Treatment Period. * Weekly APC +1 Responder: A participant who meets the criteria to be a Weekly Abdominal Pain Responder and a Weekly CSBM +1 Responder. * Weekly Abdominal Pain Responder: A participant who has a decrease from baseline of ≥30% in the mean daily worst abdominal pain scores for that week. * Weekly CSBM +1 Responder: A participant who has an increase from baseline of ≥1 in the CSBM weekly rate for that week. A participant with \<4 days of completed eDiary data for that week is not considered a responder for that week.

Number of 6/12 Week Abdominal Pain and Constipation (APC) +1 Responders Over the 12-Week Treatment Period: DR2 or IR vs. Placebo

时间窗: up to Week 12

A 6/12 Week APC +1 Responder is a participant who meets the Weekly APC +1 Responder criteria for at least 6 out of the 12 weeks of the Treatment Period. * Weekly APC +1 Responder: A participant who meets the criteria to be a Weekly Abdominal Pain Responder and a Weekly CSBM +1 Responder. * Weekly Abdominal Pain Responder: A participant who has a decrease from baseline of ≥30% in the mean daily worst abdominal pain scores for that week. * Weekly CSBM +1 Responder: A participant who has an increase from baseline of ≥1 in the CSBM weekly rate for that week. A participant with \<4 days of completed eDiary data for that week is not considered a responder for that week.

Change From Baseline in Weekly CSBM Frequency Rate Over the 12-Week Treatment Period: DR1 or IR vs. Placebo

时间窗: Baseline, up to Week 12

A participant's weekly CSBM frequency rate is the CSBM rate (CSBMs/week) calculated over that week.

Change From Baseline in Weekly Abdominal Pain Score Over the 12-Week Treatment Period: DR2 or IR vs. Placebo

时间窗: Baseline, up to Week 12

Abdominal pain assessment was based on an 11-point numerical rating scale (0=No symptom; 10=Worst possible) assessing the symptom "at its worst in past 24 hours." A participant's weekly abdominal pain score is the average of the nonmissing abdominal pain scores reported by the participant during each week.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Industry
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验