JUNTOS (TOGETHER): Development of a Family-based Latino Youth Use Preventive Intervention
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 入组人数
- 60
- 主要终点
- Coping Skills (Post-assessment; weeks 16-20)
研究概览
简要总结
The primary objective of this study is to develop and pilot-test a family-based Latino youth alcohol use preventive intervention for Latino youth (ages 14-16) and one of their parents. The preventive intervention will equip youth, parents, and families with skills to manage stress related to prejudice, discrimination, and racism as a means to reduce Latino youth alcohol use risk. Informed by ecodevelopmental, social norms, family stress, stress and coping theories, and racial socialization theories, the central hypothesis is that active coping skills can buffer against the negative effect of social stressors (i.e., experiences related to prejudice, discrimination, and racism) on youth alcohol outcomes/related risks/cognitions; and active coping skills can offset the negative effect of social stress on parental adjustment, family functioning and parenting behaviors, thereby reducing youth alcohol use risk. Using an iterative approach to intervention development, within a mixed-method research design, the purpose of this study is to construct intervention sessions that impart active coping skills to better manage social stress related to prejudice, discrimination, and racism. In Aim 1, we will use qualitative methods to inform the development of intervention sessions that target coping with prejudice, discrimination, and racism. I will conduct focus groups with youth (5 groups, n=6-8) and parents (5 groups, n=6-8) to identify how youth and parents experience and cope with perceived ethnic discrimination; the skills and resources they would like to further develop; and to seek input regarding the structure and logistics of the intervention. In Aim 2, we will create a family-based youth alcohol use preventive intervention curriculum that targets coping with prejudice, discrimination, and racism. I will identify strategies used in existing preventive interventions and draw from Aim 1 qualitative findings to develop tentative intervention sessions. We will then conduct focus groups with youth (5 groups, n=6-8) and parents (5 groups, n=6-8) to seek feedback on tentative intervention sessions. We will then integrate focus group data into the intervention curriculum and modify it accordingly and develop manuals in English and Spanish. In Aim 3, we will pilot test the intervention among Latino families (i.e., one youth and one parent) in Texas. We will pilot test the intervention with 60 families (i.e., youth-parent dyads; N=30 intervention group; N = 30 comparison group) from high schools in the Austin Independent School District to a) assess intervention feasibility and acceptability, and b) determine preliminary effect size estimates for the intervention's promise to improve youth and parent coping skills, family functioning, parenting behaviors, and youth alcohol outcomes.
详细描述
SCHOOL SELECTION FOR QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL GROUP DESIGN. For aim 4, we have selected two out of five high schools that are closely are closely matched on the following criteria: 1) % Latino student enrollment (85.6 and 84.7), 2) % of students classified as economically disadvantaged (83 and 87), 3) Student achievement scores (66 and 69), 4) Student attendance scores (92 and 93), and 5) Student mobility rate (25.8 and 25.1). The matching of the two pilot study schools on these criteria, will allow us to eliminate any potential confounds that might preclude us from teasing apart the effects of the intervention from potential confounding school level effects. If the proposed intervention shows promise, we will be able to systematically test for school level effects in a larger, future study. We then propose to randomly assign one of the two schools to serve as intervention school and one of the two schools to serve as comparison school. The random assignment of one school to serve as intervention and one school to serve as comparison school will demonstrate the feasibility of randomization for a future larger study and will eliminate concerns about crossover and contamination.
Families from the intervention school (N = 30) will then be assigned to one of three intervention groups, each consisting of about 10 families (i.e., one youth and one parent), based on their language preference (English vs. Spanish). These families will then participate in the 9 week pilot intervention and fill-out a pre- and post-assessment battery.
Families from the comparison school (N = 30) will receive weekly information packages and fill out the pre- and post-assessment battery in the same week as the intervention school families.
For both groups, we will aim towards equal representation of boys and girls as well as U.S. and foreign-born youth. In line with the academic calendar of all the schools, we will aim to deliver the intervention from January to May to avoid delays due to school holidays and vacation.
Intervention Families will receive intervention sessions designed in PHASES 1-3. Sessions will be delivered in English or Spanish, based on participants' language preferences. We will conduct three groups (10 families and 2 facilitators/group). Although the time and location will be determined after study PHASE 3, based on my discussions with AISD, intervention sessions may be offered after school in a safe room. Incentives will include weekly non-monetary incentives, starting with small incentives (e.g., pens) and increasing the incentive value in later weeks (e.g., t-shirts). Each session will include a meal. Also, the time and location of the intervention will be determined based on the qualitative interview feedback. Participants will receive $30 for each completed assessment. Intervention session content will be delivered through short presentations, small/large group discussions, role-plays, exercises and practice of new skills. Each session will include home practice of new skills. Sessions will be digitally recorded. Recording will be used for future intervention refinement. Participants will be asked to respect the privacy of other group members. Facilitators: The PI will lead intervention sessions with a bilingual facilitator. The PI will, in consultation with co-primary mentors, Martinez and Marsiglia, train the facilitator by reviewing the intervention manual, emphasizing the purpose of each intervention component session and the need to not modify the manual. We will conduct mock intervention sessions and provide in-person feedback.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Non Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Prevention
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 13 Years 至 —(Child, Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •adolescents and caregivers (i.e., parents) in all of the study phases.
- •adolescents between the ages 14 and 16, enrolled in 9th or 10th grade.
- •adolescents must identify as "Hispanic," "Latino," or pan-ethnic labels.
- •caregivers/parents with a 9th or 10th grade adolescent living at home.
- •B. SAMPLING/SCHOOL SELECTION.
- •Austin Independent School District (AISD) for this project.
- •Five high schools who meet the inclusion criteria:
- •a high proportion of Latino students (>70%).
- •a high proportion of students classified as economically disadvantaged (>50%).
- •school enrollment of at least 1000 student.
排除标准
- •Non Hispanic students and parents;
- •Any Hispanic students and parents who don't meet above criteria.
结局指标
主要结局
Coping Skills (Post-assessment; weeks 16-20)
时间窗: Pre-assessment (weeks 16-20)
COPING SKILLS will be assessed via the COPE, a multidimensional assessment of active and avoidant coping strategies. Youth and parents report the frequency of using a given coping strategy: 1 (Not at All) to 4 (A Lot). We will assess discrimination specific active and avoidant coping with the Coping with Discrimination Scale which is a modified version of the COPE and includes 18 items assessing general and 7 items assessing discrimination specific coping strategies. We will also use the General Help-Seeking Questionnaire (GHSQ), which taps into youth and parents' social support seeking. The GHSQ provides participants with a list of people from whom parents and youth seek help. Participants rate on a scale from 1 (Extremely Unlikely) to 7 (Extremely Likely) their likelihood of seeking help. Lastly, we will assess youth-parent communication with 6 items from the racial socialization scale. Participants rate on a scale 1 (Very Unlikely) to 5 (Very Likely) their racial socialization.
Coping Skills (Pre-assessment; week 1)
时间窗: Pre-assessment (week 1)
COPING SKILLS will be assessed via the COPE, a multidimensional assessment of active and avoidant coping strategies. Youth and parents report the frequency of using a given coping strategy: 1 (Not at All) to 4 (A Lot). We will assess discrimination specific active and avoidant coping with the Coping with Discrimination Scale. The CDS is a modified version of the COPE and includes 18 items assessing general and 7 items assessing discrimination specific coping strategies. We will also use the General Help-Seeking Questionnaire (GHSQ), which taps into youth and parents' social support seeking. The GHSQ provides participants with a list of people from whom parents and youth seek help. Participants rate on a scale from 1 (Extremely Unlikely) to 7 (Extremely Likely) their likelihood of seeking help. Lastly, we will assess youth-parent communication with 6 items from the racial socialization scale. Participants rate on a scale 1 (Very Unlikely) to 5 (Very Likely) their racial socialization.
次要结局
- Family Functioning and Parenting Behaviors (Post-assessment; weeks 16-20)(Post-assessment (week 16-20))
- Alcohol Use Outcomes (Pre-assessment; week 1)(Pre-assessment (week 1))
- Alcohol Use Outcomes (Post-assessment; week 16-20)(Post-assessment (week 16-20))
- Family Functioning and Parenting Behaviors (Pre-assessment; week 1)(Pre-assessment (week 1))
