Two type of anesthesia techniques, high spinal anesthesia and erector spinae block are compared for recovery parameters in randomized controlled trial in paediatric cardiac surgery patients.
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: O- Medical and SurgicalHealth Condition 2: Q208- Other congenital malformations ofcardiac chambers and connections
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2024/08/072469
- Lead Sponsor
- Post graduate institute of medical research and education
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
1Acyanotic heart disease: ASD closure, VSD closure, without severe PAH with midline sternotomy.
2.ASA I –III.
Exclusion Criteria
1.Emergency cases.
2.Active respiratory infections.
3.Patients with contraindication to spinal anesthesia or erector spinae block.
4.History of allergies to local anesthetics.
5.Pre existing neurological or spinal disorders.
•Redo cardiac surgery.
•Severe Left ventricular dysfunction.
•Severe PAH.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Duration of supportive mechanical ventilation after completion of surgery.Timepoint: Primary outcome will be measured from completion of surgery, every hourly till the patients gets extubated.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 6To assess the post-operative fentanyl requirement. <br/ ><br>•Quality of analgesia using MOPS score. <br/ ><br>Time taken for mobilizing the patient. <br/ ><br>Length of stay of the patient in the ICU. <br/ ><br>Evaluate adverse effects: hypotension, bradycardia, respiratory depression, PONV. <br/ ><br>Timepoint: 24 HOURS