Effects of Home-based vs. Clinic-based Rehabilitation on Sensorimotor, Cognition, Daily Function, and Participation
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Chronic Stroke
- Registration Number
- NCT02364232
- Lead Sponsor
- Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to compare the treatment effects of home-based or clinic-based bilateral training with and without mirror feedback programon on physiological markers, sensorimotor, cognition, daily functions, and participation among patients with chronic stroke.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 24
Inclusion Criteria
- The most recent stroke was between 1 month and 5 years
- No serious cognitive impairment (MMSE≥21)
- FMA score =18-62
- No serious muscle spasticity in shoulder, elbow, wrist and finger (MAS≤3)
- Modified rankin Scale=2 to 4
Exclusion Criteria
- Aphasia that might interfere with understanding instructions
- Stroke in areas other than the brain and brainstem, such as the cerebellum
- other neurological disease, such as dementia
- Muscle and joint have serious pain and inflammatory swelling in affected side.
- Cannot control hypertension, heart disease and serious throbosis
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Mini-Mental State Exam, MMSE Change from baseline up to 4 weeks immediately after the completion of intervention Wolf Motor Function Test, WMFT Change from baseline up to 4 weeks immediately after the completion of intervention Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory Change from baseline up to 4 weeks immediately after the completion of intervention Motor Activity Log, MAL Change from baseline up to 4 weeks immediately after the completion of intervention, and change from 4 weeks up immediately after the completion of intervention up to 3 months after the completion of intervention. Lawton-Brody IADL Scale Change from baseline up to 4 weeks immediately after the completion of intervention 10-Meter Walking Test, 10MWT Change from baseline up to 4 weeks immediately after the completion of intervention Actigraphy Change from baseline up to 4 weeks immediately after the completion of intervention The World Health Organization Quality of Life -Brief version, WHOQOL-BRE Change from baseline up to 4 weeks immediately after the completion of intervention 6 minute walk test Change from baseline up to 4 weeks immediately after the completion of intervention Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index Change from baseline up to 4 weeks immediately after the completion of intervention, and change from 4 weeks up immediately after the completion of intervention up to 3 months after the completion of intervention. pinch and grasp dynamometer Change from baseline up to 4 weeks immediately after the completion of intervention, and change from 4 weeks up immediately after the completion of intervention up to 3 months after the completion of intervention. Box and Block Test, BBT Change from baseline up to 4 weeks immediately after the completion of intervention ABILHAND Questionnaire Change from baseline up to 4 weeks immediately after the completion of intervention, and change from 4 weeks up immediately after the completion of intervention up to 3 months after the completion of intervention. Medical Research Council scale,MRC Change from baseline up to 4 weeks immediately after the completion of intervention Fugl-Myer Assessment, FMA Change from baseline up to 4 weeks immediately after the completion of intervention, and change from 4 weeks up immediately after the completion of intervention up to 3 months after the completion of intervention. Revised Nottingham Sensory Assessment Change from baseline up to 4 weeks immediately after the completion of intervention Modified Ashworth Scale, MAS Change from baseline up to 4 weeks immediately after the completion of intervention, and change from 4 weeks up immediately after the completion of intervention up to 3 months after the completion of intervention. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure, COPM Change from baseline up to 4 weeks immediately after the completion of intervention Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living, NEADL Change from baseline up to 4 weeks immediately after the completion of intervention, and change from 4 weeks up immediately after the completion of intervention up to 3 months after the completion of intervention. Stroke Impact Scale, SIS Change from baseline up to 4 weeks immediately after the completion of intervention, and change from 4 weeks up immediately after the completion of intervention up to 3 months after the completion of intervention. The Euroqol Quality of Life Scale Change from baseline up to 4 weeks immediately after the completion of intervention, and change from 4 weeks up immediately after the completion of intervention up to 3 months after the completion of intervention.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA Change from baseline up to 4 weeks immediately after the completion of intervention Minnesota Rate of Manipulation Test during dual Task Change from baseline up to 4 weeks immediately after the completion of intervention Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire-10, KVIQ-10 Change from baseline up to 4 weeks immediately after the completion of intervention BDI-II,Beck Depression Inventory II Change from baseline up to 4 weeks immediately after the completion of intervention 30 second sit-to-stand test Change from baseline up to 4 weeks immediately after the completion of intervention Timed up and go test Change from baseline up to 4 weeks immediately after the completion of intervention Movement Imagery Questionnaire- Revised, Second Edition, MIQ-RS Change from baseline up to 4 weeks immediately after the completion of intervention Stroop Test Change from baseline up to 4 weeks immediately after the completion of intervention The stroke self-efficacy questionnaire Change from baseline up to 4 weeks immediately after the completion of intervention Modified Rankin Scale, mRS baseline
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What molecular mechanisms underlie sensorimotor recovery in chronic stroke patients using bilateral training with mirror feedback?
How does home-based bilateral training with mirror feedback compare to clinic-based rehabilitation in improving cognitive functions post-stroke?
Are there specific biomarkers that predict response to bilateral sensorimotor training in chronic stroke populations?
What are the potential adverse events associated with mirror feedback therapy in stroke rehabilitation and how are they managed?
What combination therapies or alternative approaches are being explored alongside bilateral training for chronic stroke recovery?
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
🇨🇳Taoyuan County, Taiwan
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital🇨🇳Taoyuan County, Taiwan