MedPath

Intra-individual Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Metvix® Natural Daylight Photodynamic Therapy Versus Conventional Metvix® Photodynamic Therapy in Subject With Mild Actinic Keratoses

Phase 3
Completed
Conditions
Actinic Keratoses
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT01475071
Lead Sponsor
Galderma R&D
Brief Summary

The main objective of this study is to compare efficacy and safety of Metvix® natural daylight photodynamic therapy with those of Metvix® conventional photodynamic therapy with Aktilite™ lamp in subjects with mild actinic keratoses (intra-individual comparison).

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
100
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Male or female above 18 years;
  2. Subject with clinical diagnosis of mild AK on the face or the scalp with or without clinical diagnosis of moderate AK on the target areas (TAs);
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Subject with clinical diagnosis of at least one severe AK on TAs
  2. Subject with clinical diagnosis of other skin disease (including non-melanoma skin cancer) on the TAs;
  3. Subject with pigmented AK on the TAs

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Metvix and lampMetvix and conventional PDT-
Metvix and daylightMetvix and natural daylight PDT-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Lesion ResponseWeek12

Percent of lesions treated at Baseline, in complete response at Week 12

Pain ScoreBaseline (during procedure), assessed after procedure

Subject self assessment of pain on a scale from 0 (no pain ) to 10 (extreme pain)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

Galderma Investigational site

🇦🇺

Carlton, Victoria, Australia

Galderma Investigational Site

🇦🇺

Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath