Intra-individual Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Metvix® Natural Daylight Photodynamic Therapy Versus Conventional Metvix® Photodynamic Therapy in Subject With Mild Actinic Keratoses
- Conditions
- Actinic Keratoses
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT01475071
- Lead Sponsor
- Galderma R&D
- Brief Summary
The main objective of this study is to compare efficacy and safety of Metvix® natural daylight photodynamic therapy with those of Metvix® conventional photodynamic therapy with Aktilite™ lamp in subjects with mild actinic keratoses (intra-individual comparison).
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 100
- Male or female above 18 years;
- Subject with clinical diagnosis of mild AK on the face or the scalp with or without clinical diagnosis of moderate AK on the target areas (TAs);
- Subject with clinical diagnosis of at least one severe AK on TAs
- Subject with clinical diagnosis of other skin disease (including non-melanoma skin cancer) on the TAs;
- Subject with pigmented AK on the TAs
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Metvix and lamp Metvix and conventional PDT - Metvix and daylight Metvix and natural daylight PDT -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Lesion Response Week12 Percent of lesions treated at Baseline, in complete response at Week 12
Pain Score Baseline (during procedure), assessed after procedure Subject self assessment of pain on a scale from 0 (no pain ) to 10 (extreme pain)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (2)
Galderma Investigational site
🇦🇺Carlton, Victoria, Australia
Galderma Investigational Site
🇦🇺Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia