Nurse-Physician Communication Team Training in Virtual Reality Versus Live Simulations: Randomized Controlled Study
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 120
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Demographics
研究概览
简要总结
Nurse-physician communication skills can be improve through inter-professional team training. Simulation is often used to conduct these training. However, constraints to conduct these sessions such as scheduling and logistic arrangements have been widely reported. Thus with the advancement of technology in education, the use of virtual environment to conduct the team training is being explored and evaluated.
详细描述
All recruited participants underwent a 3-hour nurse-physician communication training prior to the simulation session. Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety (TeamSTEPPS) curriculum and pre-learning videos were introduced to the participants. Pre-test questionnaires were administered after the training. Participants were then randomized to the control (live simulation) or intervention group (virtual simulation).
Intervention group participants will undergo a virtual simulation session training via the multi-user virtual world by logging in into the 3D virtual environment while participants in the control group performed the simulations in a physical simulated ward setting. Each pair of 1 medical student and 1 nursing student participate in two role-playing simulation scenarios (15-20 minutes each) along with a facilitator who will provide a debrief (30-minutes). Prior to the simulation, participants were given a smart-watch to monitor their physiological parameters such as heart rate. Post-test questionnaires were administered after the simulation sessions.
After the simulation training, a 30-minutes team-based assessments were conducted based on a inter-professional bedside care scenario in pairs of one medical and one nursing student within their randomized group. The assessments were video recorded for evaluation by assessors who are blinded to the groupings. All participants were then invited to complete a follow-up questionnaire 2 months after the simulation training.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Other
- 盲法
- Single (Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •i) Full time students undertaking National University of Singapore's
- •Third or fourth year Bachelor of Science (Nursing)
- •Third or fourth year Bachelor of Medicine & Bachelor of Surgery
- •ii) Completed acute care management modules
排除标准
- •i) Does not voluntarily agree to join the study
- •ii) Does not want their performance to be video-recorded
结局指标
主要结局
Demographics
时间窗: Baseline
Collection of participant demographic data.
Pulse rate
时间窗: Pre-test
Stress measurement parameter using a continuous monitoring smart watch
Blood pressure (diastolic & systolic)
时间窗: Pre-test
Stress measurement parameter using a sphygmomanometer
Post-test (Change of State-Trait Anxiety Inventory from baseline)
时间窗: Post-test (immediately after simulation training)
Measurement of participants state anxiety were measured using the 20-items State-Trait Anxiety Inventory questionnaire using a 4 point likert scale (almost never-almost always). The score ranges from 20 to 80 with higher score indicating higher sense of anxiety.
Baseline (Confidence and self-efficacy)
时间窗: Pre-test
Measurement of participants confidence and self-efficacy was measured using a 5-items self-efficacy questionnaire through a 10-point likert scale ranging from scores ranging from 5 to 50 with higher score indicating better self-efficacy in their ability in contributing to patient-centered care in a multidisciplinary team.
Communication skill performance
时间窗: Post-test (immediately after simulation assessment)
Participants nurse-doctor communication skill was measured using a validated team communication scale that was self-developed. It is a 7-item checklist with a 5-point scale. The score ranges from 5 to 35 with higher score indicating better nurse-doctor communication performance.
Baseline (Attitudes Toward Interprofessional Health Care Team)
时间窗: Pre-test
Measurement of participants' attitudes towards working in interprofessional care team using the 14-item Attitudes Toward Interprofessional Health Care Team questionnaire using a 5-point scale. The scores ranges from 14 to 70 with higher score indicating more positive attitudes.
Post-test (Change of Attitudes Toward Interprofessional Health Care Team from baseline)
时间窗: Post-test (immediately after simulation training)
Measurement of participants' attitudes towards working in interprofessional care team using the 14-item Attitudes Toward Interprofessional Health Care Team questionnaire using a 5-point scale. The scores ranges from 14 to 70 with higher score indicating more positive attitudes.
Post-test (Change of Interprofessional Socialization and Valuing Scale from baseline)
时间窗: Post-test (immediately after simulation training)
Measurement of participants behaviors, beliefs and attitudes in interprofessional socialization using the 24-item Interprofessional Socialization and Valuing Scale questionnaire using a 7-point scale (1= not at all ; 7= to a very great extent; "not applicable" response is also available). The score ranges from 24 to 168 with higher score indicating greater presence of the attributes measured.
Pulse rate (Change of parameter from baseline)
时间窗: Post-test (immediately after simulation training)
Stress measurement parameter using a continuous monitoring smart watch
Blood pressure (diastolic & systolic) (Change of parameter from baseline)
时间窗: Post-test (immediately after simulation training)
Stress measurement parameter using a sphygmomanometer
Baseline (Student Stereotype Rating)
时间窗: Pre-test
Measurement of participants stereotype towards other health disciplines was measured using the 9-items Student Stereotype Rating Questionnaire through a 5-point Likert scale (1=very low to 5= very high). The score ranges from 9 to 45 with higher scores indicating higher perceived ability of the particular healthcare discipline by the other discipline.
Follow up (Change of Student Stereotype Rating from baseline and post test)
时间窗: Follow-up (2-months after simulation training)
Measurement of participants stereotype towards other health disciplines was measured using the 9-items Student Stereotype Rating Questionnaire through a 5-point Likert scale (1=very low to 5= very high). The score ranges from 9 to 45 with higher scores indicating higher perceived ability of the particular healthcare discipline by the other discipline.
Follow-up (Change of Attitudes Toward Interprofessional Health Care Team from baseline and post-test)
时间窗: Follow-up (2-months after simulation training)
Measurement of participants attitudes towards working in interprofessional care team using the 14-item Attitudes Toward Interprofessional Health Care Team questionnaire using a 5-point scale. The scores ranges from 14 to 70 with higher score indicating more positive attitudes.
Post-test (Change of Confidence and self-efficacy from baseline)
时间窗: Post-test (immediately after simulation training)
Measurement of participants confidence and self-efficacy was measured using a 5-items self-efficacy questionnaire through a 10-point likert scale ranging from scores ranging from 5 to 50 with higher score indicating better self-efficacy in their ability in contributing to patient-centered care in a multidisciplinary team.
Baseline (Interprofessional Socialization and Valuing Scale)
时间窗: Pre-test
Measurement of participants behaviors, beliefs and attitudes in interprofessional socialization using the 24-item Interprofessional Socialization and Valuing Scale questionnaire using a 7-point scale (1= not at all ; 7= to a very great extent; "not applicable" response is also available). The score ranges from 24 to 168 with higher score indicating greater presence of the attributes measured.
Follow-up (Change of Interprofessional Socialization and Valuing Scale from baseline and post-test)
时间窗: Follow-up (2-months after simulation training)
Measurement of participants behaviors, beliefs and attitudes in interprofessional socialization using the 24-item Interprofessional Socialization and Valuing Scale questionnaire using a 7-point scale (1= not at all ; 7= to a very great extent; "not applicable" response is also available). The score ranges from 24 to 168 with higher score indicating greater presence of the attributes measured.
Baseline (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory)
时间窗: Pre-test
Measurement of participants state anxiety were measured using the 20-items State-Trait Anxiety Inventory questionnaire using a 4 point likert scale (almost never-almost always). The score ranges from 20 to 80 with higher score indicating higher sense of anxiety.
Post test (Change of Student Stereotype Rating from baseline)
时间窗: Post-test (immediately after simulation training)
Measurement of participants stereotype towards other health disciplines was measured using the 9-items Student Stereotype Rating Questionnaire through a 5-point Likert scale (1=very low to 5= very high). The score ranges from 9 to 45 with higher scores indicating higher perceived ability of the particular healthcare discipline by the other discipline.
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Liaw Sok Ying
Associate Professor
National University of Singapore