Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT07702864
NCT07702864Not yet recruitingNot Applicable

Pilot Feasibility Study of a Dyadic Culinary Nutrition Intervention

University of Arizona1 site in 1 country40 target enrollmentStarted: January 1, 2027Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Not yet recruiting
Enrollment
40
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Feasibility measured by enrollment rate

Study Overview

Brief Summary

This study will determine the feasibility and acceptability of a 12-week dyadic culinary nutrition program among Hispanic prostate cancer survivor/caregiver dyads using a randomized controlled trial design.

Detailed Description

Prostate cancer is the most common cancer among Hispanic/Latino men. Following treatment, both survivors and their family caregivers often experience long-term side effects that can be managed through diet. However, few survivors or caregivers meet current nutritional guidelines, and most interventions focus solely on the patient. Because co-residing couples share meals and routines, targeting the survivor-caregiver dyad together may be more effective for dietary modification. This pilot study evaluates "Cooking Healthy - Engaging Families" (CHEF), a remote, dyadic culinary nutrition program designed to improve dietary intake for Hispanic prostate cancer survivors and caregivers.

This pilot study utilizes a randomized controlled trial (RCT) design to determine the feasibility and acceptability of the CHEF intervention.The study aims to recruit 20 dyads (n=40 total participants) meeting the following criteria:

Survivors: Hispanic men post-treatment for prostate cancer (≥ 6 weeks from completion of primary curative treatment).

Caregivers: Informal, co-residing caregivers of the enrolled survivors.

Participants will be randomized to evaluate the program's delivery, engagement, and acceptability in a remote format. Additionally, the study will explore secondary outcomes, including changes in dietary intake and serum carotenoid levels.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Masking
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 90 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • History of prostate cancer diagnosis at any stage (I-IV)
  • Identifies as Hispanic
  • Completed primary curative treatment (e.g., chemotherapy, radiation, surgery) 6 weeks prior to enrollment.
  • Note: Men on continuing hormone therapy (ADT) or immunotherapy as maintenance or consolidation treatment are eligible. Men on active surveillance only (no treatment) are not eligible.
  • Inclusion Criterion: Caregivers
  • Provides unpaid support for the cancer survivor
  • No prior history of cancer (except non-melanoma skin cancer) Note: Caregivers do not need to identify as Hispanic to be eligible
  • Inclusion Criteria: Survivors and Caregivers
  • Aged 18-90 years
  • Reports low fruit and vegetable intake
  • Able to write, read, and speak in English or Spanish
  • Access to a mobile device with Internet and a camera
  • Co-residing and able to participate at the same time and location

Exclusion Criteria

  • Survivors and Caregivers
  • Cognitive difficulties that preclude answering the survey questions, that answering survey questions or participating in study activities, or providing informed consent.
  • A medical condition, movement or neurological disorder, or medication use that contraindicates participation in meal preparation.
  • Not co-residing (live in the separate households).
  • No survivor or caregiver available or willing to participate simultaneously.
  • Less than 18 years or greater than 90 years of age.

Arms & Interventions

Intervention

Experimental

Dyadic culinary nutrition program

Intervention: Cooking Healthy - Engaging Families (CHEF) (Behavioral)

Education Control

Active Comparator

Nutrition education

Intervention: Control (Behavioral)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Feasibility measured by enrollment rate

Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks

Will be determined as the enrollment rate- the number of dyads enrolled out of those approached and eligible using descriptive statistics.

Appropriateness measured by retention rate

Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks

Will be determined as the retention rate- calculated as the number of dyads (survivor-caregiver pairs) completing the study versus dyads consented using descriptive statistics.

Acceptability measured by adherence rate

Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks

Acceptability will be measured by adherence rate to the intervention calculated as the total number of classes attended divided by the total possible schedule the patient could attend using descriptive statistics.

Composite measure of implementation success

Time Frame: 12 weeks

Implementation success will be measured by a single composite questionnaire that will determine the extent to which the intervention is considered feasible, appropriate, and acceptable. Responses are summary scored with a possible range of 4-20; higher scores indicate greater feasibility, appropriateness, and acceptability.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Fruit and Vegetable Servings(Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks)
  • Concentration of Carotenoid Biomarkers(Baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials