Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04600557
NCT04600557CompletedNot Applicable

A Compassion-based Intervention for Internal and External Shame

University of Texas at Austin1 site in 1 country439 target enrollmentStarted: February 12, 2019Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
439
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Internal shame

Study Overview

Brief Summary

This is a four-arm randomized pilot study aimed at reducing internal and/or external shame using self-compassion and/or compassion from others. The study is designed to test the theory that trait shame is comprised of both internal and external shame and to test compassion for others as an intervention for external shame.

Detailed Description

Shame is a common, painful emotion involving negative evaluations of the self. It has been theorized that trait shame involves both internal shame (i.e., evaluating oneself negatively) and external shame (i.e., perceiving that others evaluate the self negatively). Shame is experienced across a variety of psychiatric illnesses, yet it has been highly understudied.

Self-compassion has been used as an intervention for reducing shame in a variety of research studies, often in the context of a specific psychiatric disorder. However, self-compassion interventions, which aim to change the way one thinks and feels about oneself, may specifically target internal shame but not external shame. It is proposed that receiving compassion from others is an analogous and plausible intervention for external shame. In order to test the theory that trait shame is comprised of both internal and external shame and to test compassion for others as an intervention for external shame, a four-arm randomized pilot study aimed at reducing internal and/or external shame using self-compassion and/or compassion from others is proposed here.

Participants (N=180) scoring high on both internal and external shame on self-report measures will be assessed at baseline using both questionnaires and a shame-memory recall. Participants will be randomized to one of four conditions: a) describing a shameful experience using a self-compassionate prompt and receiving no verbal responses from confederates (self-compassion only), b) describing a shameful experience using a neutral prompt and receiving compassionate responses from confederates (compassion from others only), c) both describing a shameful experience using a self-compassionate prompt and receiving compassionate responses from confederates (self-compassion plus compassion from others), or d) describing a shameful experience using a neutral prompt and receiving no verbal responses from confederates (sharing-only control). Participants will complete questionnaires and shame-memory recalls again immediately following the sharing intervention and at a one-week post-intervention follow-up.

The two primary outcome measures will be state internal shame, as measured by the Internalized Shame Sclae, and state external shame, as measured by the Other As a Shamer scale. Both the Internalized Shame Scale and Other As a Shamer scale will be administered at baseline (immediately pre-treatment), immediately post-treatment, and a one-week post-intervention follow-up. Secondary outcome measures will include the Positive and Negative Affect Scale, and a real-time assessment of state shame.

It is expected that (a) participants assigned to describe a shameful experience using self-compassionate instructions will display larger reductions in internal shame relative to those assigned to describe a shameful experience using neutral instructions; (b) participants who receive compassionate responses from others after sharing a shameful experience will display larger reductions in external shame relative to those assigned to a listening-only control; and (c) participants assigned to describe a shameful experience using self-compassionate instructions combined with receiving compassionate responses from others will display larger reductions in both internal and external shame relative to participants who receive either component alone.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Participant)

Masking Description

Participants are not told which arm they are assigned to

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Elevated levels of internal and external shame
  • •Can recall two shameful experiences

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Active suicidal ideation as measured by endorsement of 2 (I would like to kill myself) or 3 (I would kill myself if I had the chance) on BDI-II item 9
  • •Endorses intent to harm or kill others

Arms & Interventions

Self-compassion only

Experimental

Describing a shameful experience using a self-compassionate prompt and receiving no verbal responses from confederates

Intervention: Describing a shameful experience using a self-compassionate prompt (Behavioral)

Self-compassion only

Experimental

Describing a shameful experience using a self-compassionate prompt and receiving no verbal responses from confederates

Intervention: Receiving no response from confederates (Behavioral)

Compassion from others only

Experimental

Describing a shameful experience using a neutral prompt and receiving compassionate responses from confederates

Intervention: Receiving compassionate responses from confederates (Behavioral)

Compassion from others only

Experimental

Describing a shameful experience using a neutral prompt and receiving compassionate responses from confederates

Intervention: Describing a shameful experience using a neutral prompt (Behavioral)

Self-compassion plus compassion from others

Experimental

Both describing a shameful experience using a self-compassionate prompt and receiving compassionate responses from confederates

Intervention: Describing a shameful experience using a self-compassionate prompt (Behavioral)

Self-compassion plus compassion from others

Experimental

Both describing a shameful experience using a self-compassionate prompt and receiving compassionate responses from confederates

Intervention: Receiving compassionate responses from confederates (Behavioral)

Sharing-only control

Active Comparator

Describing a shameful experience using a neutral prompt and receiving no verbal responses from confederates

Intervention: Describing a shameful experience using a neutral prompt (Behavioral)

Sharing-only control

Active Comparator

Describing a shameful experience using a neutral prompt and receiving no verbal responses from confederates

Intervention: Receiving no response from confederates (Behavioral)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Internal shame

Time Frame: 5 minutes post-intervention

Measured by scores on Internalized Shame Scale (range: 0-120, higher indicates more shame)

External shame

Time Frame: 5 minutes post-intervention

Measured by scores on Other As Shamer Scale (range: 0-72, higher indicates more shame)

Internal shame

Time Frame: One-week post-intervention

Measured by scores on Internalized Shame Scale (range: 0-120, higher indicates more shame)

External shame

Time Frame: One-week post-intervention

Measured by scores on Other As Shamer Scale (range: 0-72, higher indicates more shame)

Secondary Outcomes

  • Shame activation(one-week follow-up)
  • State shame(one-week follow-up)
  • Electrodermal response to shame(one-week follow-up)
  • Blood volume pulse in reaction to shame(one-week follow-up)
  • Motion in reaction to shame(one-week follow-up)
  • Skin temperature reaction to shame(one-week follow-up)
  • Shame activation(5 minutes post-intervention)
  • State shame(5 minutes post-intervention)
  • Electrodermal response to shame(5 minutes post-intervention)
  • Blood volume pulse in reaction to shame(5 minutes post-intervention)
  • Motion in reaction to shame(5 minutes post-intervention)
  • Skin temperature reaction to shame(5 minutes post-intervention)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Michael J. Telch

Professor of Psychology

University of Texas at Austin

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials