Efficacy Study of HoLEP and TURP on LUTS Secondary to BPH
Phase 2
Completed
- Conditions
- Benign Prostatic HyperplasiaLower Urinary Tract Symptoms
- Registration Number
- NCT00877669
- Lead Sponsor
- Samsung Medical Center
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare of Efficacy and Safety Between Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) and Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP) on the Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) Secondary to Benign Prostate Hyperplasia (BPH).
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- Male
- Target Recruitment
- 313
Inclusion Criteria
- 50 yrs or greater
- International prostatic symptom score >= 12
- Bladder outlet obstruction confirmed by pressure-flow study (BOOI > 20)
- Able to give fully informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
- Patients with urologic malignancies such as prostate cancer and bladder cancer
- Patients underwent urethral, prostate surgery
- Patients with urethral stricture or bladder diverticulum or bladder neck contracture
- Patients with histories of bacterial prostatitis within 1 year
- seems not to be appropriate to this study by the decision of investigators because of any other reasons
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The changes of International Prostatic Symptom Scores (IPSS) from baseline to 6 months after operation 6 months
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Ejaculation parameter 6 months after operation The changes of the hemoglobin and the serum sodium 0 and 1 day after operation Complications During all study periods The changes of IPSS and QoL parameters 1 month and 3months after operation Operative time and Resected tissue weight 0 day after operation The changes of Patient perception of treatment benefit questionnaire (PPTB) parameters 3 and 6 months after operation The changes of Quality of Life (QoL) parameters 6 months The changes of Uroflowmetry (UFM) and Postvoid residual urine(PVR) parameters 2 weeks and 3 and 6 months after operation The changes of voiding frequencies and urgency parameters in Frequency volume chart 3 and 6 months after operation The changes of ICS male questionnaire (short form) parameters 3 and 6 months after operation The changes of international index of erectile function (IIEF)-15 parameters 6 months after operation Postoperative hospital stay days and postoperative catheterization days immediate postoperative period
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What molecular mechanisms differentiate HoLEP from TURP in treating BPH-related LUTS?
How does HoLEP compare to TURP in long-term efficacy for BPH-induced LUTS management?
Are there specific biomarkers that predict better outcomes with HoLEP versus TURP in BPH patients?
What are the adverse event profiles and management strategies for HoLEP and TURP in BPH treatment?
How do HoLEP and TURP compare to other minimally invasive therapies like UroLift or Rezum for BPH-related LUTS?
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Samsung Medical Center
🇰🇷Seoul, Korea, Republic of
Samsung Medical Center🇰🇷Seoul, Korea, Republic of